Literature DB >> 17538165

Gemcitabine plus capecitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in advanced pancreatic cancer: a randomized, multicenter, phase III trial of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research and the Central European Cooperative Oncology Group.

Richard Herrmann1, György Bodoky, Thomas Ruhstaller, Bengt Glimelius, Emilio Bajetta, Johannes Schüller, Piercarlo Saletti, Jean Bauer, Arie Figer, Bernhard Pestalozzi, Claus-Henning Köhne, Walter Mingrone, Salomon M Stemmer, Karin Tàmas, Gabriela V Kornek, Dieter Koeberle, Susanne Cina, Jürg Bernhard, Daniel Dietrich, Werner Scheithauer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This phase III trial compared the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine (Gem) plus capecitabine (GemCap) versus single-agent Gem in advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive GemCap (oral capecitabine 650 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1 to 14 plus Gem 1,000 mg/m2 by 30-minute infusion on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks) or Gem (1,000 mg/m2 by 30-minute infusion weekly for 7 weeks, followed by a 1-week break, and then weekly for 3 weeks every 4 weeks). Patients were stratified according to center, Karnofsky performance score (KPS), presence of pain, and disease extent.
RESULTS: A total of 319 patients were enrolled between June 2001 and June 2004. Median overall survival (OS) time, the primary end point, was 8.4 and 7.2 months in the GemCap and Gem arms, respectively (P = .234). Post hoc analysis in patients with good KPS (score of 90 to 100) showed a significant prolongation of median OS time in the GemCap arm compared with the Gem arm (10.1 v 7.4 months, respectively; P = .014). The overall frequency of grade 3 or 4 adverse events was similar in each arm. Neutropenia was the most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse event in both arms.
CONCLUSION: GemCap failed to improve OS at a statistically significant level compared with standard Gem treatment. The safety of GemCap and Gem was similar. In the subgroup of patients with good performance status, median OS was improved significantly. GemCap is a practical regimen that may be considered as an alternative to single-agent Gem for the treatment of advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer patients with a good performance status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17538165     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.0886

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  205 in total

1.  A 4-week versus a 3-week schedule of gemcitabine monotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer: a randomized phase II study to evaluate toxicity and dose intensity.

Authors:  Ken Hirao; Hirofumi Kawamoto; Ichiro Sakakihara; Yasuhiro Noma; Naoki Yamamoto; Ryo Harada; Koichiro Tsutsumi; Masakuni Fujii; Hironari Kato; Naoko Kurihara; Osamu Mizuno; Tsuneyoshi Ogawa; Etsuji Ishida; Kazuhide Yamamoto
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Second-line therapy for gemcitabine-pretreated advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Romain Altwegg; Marc Ychou; Vanessa Guillaumon; Simon Thezenas; Pierre Senesse; Nicolas Flori; Thibault Mazard; Ludovic Caillo; Stéphanie Faure; Emmanuelle Samalin; Eric Assenat
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Developments in metastatic pancreatic cancer: is gemcitabine still the standard?

Authors:  Jie-Er Ying; Li-Ming Zhu; Bi-Xia Liu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Margaret A Tempero; J Pablo Arnoletti; Stephen Behrman; Edgar Ben-Josef; Al B Benson; Jordan D Berlin; John L Cameron; Ephraim S Casper; Steven J Cohen; Michelle Duff; Joshua D I Ellenhorn; William G Hawkins; John P Hoffman; Boris W Kuvshinoff; Mokenge P Malafa; Peter Muscarella; Eric K Nakakura; Aaron R Sasson; Sarah P Thayer; Douglas S Tyler; Robert S Warren; Samuel Whiting; Christopher Willett; Robert A Wolff
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 11.908

5.  Gemcitabine plus erlotinib followed by capecitabine versus capecitabine plus erlotinib followed by gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer: final results of a randomised phase 3 trial of the 'Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie' (AIO-PK0104).

Authors:  Volker Heinemann; Ursula Vehling-Kaiser; Dirk Waldschmidt; Erika Kettner; Angela Märten; Cornelia Winkelmann; Stefan Klein; Georgi Kojouharoff; Thomas C Gauler; Ludwig Fischer von Weikersthal; Michael R Clemens; Michael Geissler; Tim F Greten; Susanna Hegewisch-Becker; Oleg Rubanov; Gerold Baake; Thomas Höhler; Yon D Ko; Andreas Jung; Sascha Neugebauer; Stefan Boeck
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Elevated baseline CA19-9 levels correlate with adverse prognosis in patients with early- or advanced-stage pancreas cancer.

Authors:  Ludmila Katherine Martin; Lai Wei; Elizabeth Trolli; Tanios Bekaii-Saab
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2012-06-24       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 7.  Preclinical Rationale for the Phase III Trials in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Is Wishful Thinking Clouding Successful Drug Development for Pancreatic Cancer?

Authors:  Ramya Thota; Anirban Maitra; Jordan D Berlin
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.327

8.  Imexon enhances gemcitabine cytotoxicity by inhibition of ribonucleotide reductase.

Authors:  Nicholas O Roman; Betty K Samulitis; Lee Wisner; Terry H Landowski; Robert T Dorr
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 9.  Current treatment options for pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  Emily Castellanos; Jordan Berlin; Dana Backlund Cardin
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.075

10.  Outcomes in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma With the Introduction of New Chemotherapeutic Drugs: 10-Year Experience of a Single NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Authors:  Kevin J Zhang; Greg Dyson; Joshua L Gatz; Michael E Silverman; Anteneh A Tesfaye; Anthony F Shields; Philip A Philip
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.339

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.