Literature DB >> 21519814

A 4-week versus a 3-week schedule of gemcitabine monotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer: a randomized phase II study to evaluate toxicity and dose intensity.

Ken Hirao1, Hirofumi Kawamoto, Ichiro Sakakihara, Yasuhiro Noma, Naoki Yamamoto, Ryo Harada, Koichiro Tsutsumi, Masakuni Fujii, Hironari Kato, Naoko Kurihara, Osamu Mizuno, Tsuneyoshi Ogawa, Etsuji Ishida, Kazuhide Yamamoto.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This randomized phase II study compared the efficacy and toxicity between 4-week and 3-week schedules of gemcitabine monotherapy in advanced pancreatic cancer.
METHODS: Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer were randomly assigned to either a 4-week schedule (gemcitabine at 1000 mg/m² as a 30-min infusion weekly for 3 consecutive weeks every 4 weeks) or a 3-week schedule (gemcitabine at 1000 mg/m² as a 30-min infusion weekly for 2 consecutive weeks every 3 weeks). The primary endpoint was the compliance rate during the first 8 weeks between the two groups.
RESULTS: A total of 90 patients were enrolled. The compliance rate during the first 8 weeks was the same (53.3%). For the 4- and 3-week schedules, the tumor response rates were 14.2 and 17.1% (p = 0.92), median progression free survival was 112 and 114 days (p = 0.82), and median overall survival was 206 and 250 days (p = 0.84), respectively. Grade 3-4 neutropenia was the major adverse event in both schedules: 37.7 and 35.5% (p = 0.82). In contrast, thrombocytopenia (platelet count <70000/mm³) was significantly higher for the 4-week schedule: 26.6 and 4.4% (p = 0.008). The mean received dose intensity was equal: 588 and 550 mg/m²/week (p = 0.14).
CONCLUSIONS: The 3-week schedule of gemcitabine did not improve the compliance rate during 8 weeks compared with the 4-week schedule, but it attained a comparable efficacy with lower toxicity. Further investigation will be needed to introduce it into daily practice. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN ID 974.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21519814     DOI: 10.1007/s10147-011-0237-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1341-9625            Impact factor:   3.402


  18 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  [Late phase II study of LY188011 (gemcitabine hydrochloride) in patient with non-small-cell lung cancer. Gemcitabine Late Phase II Cooperative Study Group A)].

Authors:  M Fukuoka; S Negoro; S Kudo; K Furuse; H Nishikawa; Y Takada; T Kamei; H Niitani; T Taguchi
Journal:  Gan To Kagaku Ryoho       Date:  1996-11

3.  A single scale for comparing dose-intensity of all chemotherapy regimens in breast cancer: summation dose-intensity.

Authors:  W Hryniuk; E Frei; F A Wright
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Gemcitabine versus cisplatin, epirubicin, fluorouracil, and gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer: a randomised controlled multicentre phase III trial.

Authors:  Michele Reni; Stefano Cordio; Carlo Milandri; Paolo Passoni; Elisa Bonetto; Cristina Oliani; Gabriele Luppi; Roberto Nicoletti; Laura Galli; Roberto Bordonaro; Alessandro Passardi; Alessandro Zerbi; Gianpaolo Balzano; Luca Aldrighetti; Carlo Staudacher; Eugenio Villa; Valerio Di Carlo
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Randomized phase II clinical trials.

Authors:  R Simon; R E Wittes; S S Ellenberg
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1985-12

6.  Global cancer statistics, 2002.

Authors:  D Max Parkin; Freddie Bray; J Ferlay; Paola Pisani
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Phase I trial of gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  S Okada; H Ueno; T Okusaka; M Ikeda; J Furuse; Y Maru
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  Three-week versus four-week schedule of cisplatin and gemcitabine: results of a randomized phase II study.

Authors:  H Soto Parra; R Cavina; F Latteri; A Sala; M Dambrosio; G Antonelli; E Morenghi; M Alloisio; G Ravasi; A Santoro
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  Survival from cancer of the pancreas in England and Wales up to 2001.

Authors:  N Starling; D Cunningham
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Survival from cancer of the pancreas in England and Wales up to 2001.

Authors:  E Mitry; B Rachet; M J Quinn; N Cooper; M P Coleman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Overcoming nucleoside analog chemoresistance of pancreatic cancer: a therapeutic challenge.

Authors:  Sau Wai Hung; Hardik R Mody; Rajgopal Govindarajan
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 2.  Chemotherapy and radiotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Venessa Chin; Adnan Nagrial; Katrin Sjoquist; Chelsie A O'Connor; Lorraine Chantrill; Andrew V Biankin; Rob Jpm Scholten; Desmond Yip
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-03-20
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.