Literature DB >> 17537217

Prospective non-randomized evaluation of four mediators of the systemic response after extraperitoneal laparoscopic and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.

Andreas Jurczok1, Mario Zacharias, Sigrid Wagner, Amir Hamza, Paolo Fornara.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report a prospective, controlled, non-randomized patient study to determine the systemic response to extraperitoneal laparoscopic (eLRP) and open retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 403 patients who had eLRP (163) or open RRP (240) were recruited; patients in both groups had similar preoperative staging. In addition to peri-operative variables (operative duration, complications, blood loss, transfusion rate, hospitalization, catheterization), oncological data (Gleason score, pathological stage, positive margins) were also compared. The extent of the systemic response to surgery-induced tissue trauma was measured in all patients, by assessing the levels of acute-phase markers C-reactive protein (CRP), serum amyloid A (SAA), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and IL-10 before, during and after RP.
RESULTS: The duration of surgery, transfusion rate, hospital stay and duration of catheterization were comparable with those in previous studies. There was an increase in IL-6, CRP and SAA but no change in IL-10, and no differences between eLRP and RRP over the entire period assessed.
CONCLUSION: The invasiveness of eLRP could not be substantiated objectively based on the variables measured in this study. The surgical trauma and associated invasiveness of both methods were equivalent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17537217     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.06849.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  10 in total

1.  Inflammatory impact of NOTES peritoneoscopy is not different from that of laparoscopy: a randomized comparative study in a survival porcine model.

Authors:  Carlos Guarner-Argente; Graciela Martínez-Pallí; Ricard Navarro-Ripoll; Henry Córdova; Mireia Beltrán; M Angels Martínez-Zamora; Jaume Comas; Cristina Rodríguez de Miguel; Antonio Rodríguez-D'Jesús; Xavier Filella; Clara Hernández-Cera; Antonio M Lacy; Christopher C Thompson; Gloria Fernández-Esparrach
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-09-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy induces lower tissue trauma than radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Denise Quinto; Sabrina T Reis; Lucca Juvele Zampolli; Ruan Pimenta; Vanessa R Guimarães; Nayara I Viana; Gabriel A Dos Santos; Mario P Gimenez; Katia R Leite; Hamilton Zampolli; José Arnaldo S da Cruz; Miguel Srougi; Carlo C Passerotti
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2020-10-03

3.  Prospective comparison of scar-related satisfaction and quality of life after laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy: no differences from patients' point of view.

Authors:  Nicolas Barry Delongchamps; Olivier Belas; Djillali Saighi; Marc Zerbib; Michaël Peyromaure
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Versatility of 3D laproscopy for radical prostatectomy: A single tertiary cancer center experience.

Authors:  Dipin Jayaprakash; Keval Patel; Mohamed Mithi; Harish Neelamraju Lakshmi; Shahsank Pandya
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-02-14

5.  Reducing blood loss in open radical retropubic prostatectomy with prophylactic periprostatic sutures.

Authors:  Gustavo F Carvalhal; Christopher R Griffin; Donghui Kan; Stacy Loeb; William J Catalona
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Laparoscopic versus open bilateral intrafascial nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy after TUR-P for incidental prostate cancer: surgical outcomes and effect on postoperative urinary continence and sexual potency.

Authors:  Christopher Springer; Antonino Inferrera; Giovannalberto Pini; Nasreldin Mohammed; Paolo Fornara; Francesco Greco
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Rectourinary fistula after radical prostatectomy: review of the literature for incidence, etiology, and management.

Authors:  Hiroshi Kitamura; Taiji Tsukamoto
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2011-01-26

8.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with bladder neck preservation: positive surgical margin and urinary continence status.

Authors:  Tomasz Golabek; Jaroslaw Jaskulski; Piotr Jarecki; Przemysław Dudek; Tomasz Szopiński; Piotr Chłosta
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 1.195

9.  Robot-assisted and laparoscopic vs open radical prostatectomy in clinically localized prostate cancer: perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes: A Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lan Cao; Zhenyu Yang; Lin Qi; Minfeng Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  Optimizing the formation of vesicourethral anastomosis and reduction of procedure time. A two-year experience with a modified technique for endoscopic running vesicourethral anastomosis.

Authors:  Tomasz Golabek; Tomasz Wiatr; Mikolaj Przydacz; Jakub Bukowczan; Przemyslaw Dudek; Robert Sobczynski; Katarzyna Golabek; Piotr L Chłosta
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2015-09-07
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.