Literature DB >> 17537118

Surgical wound-healing complications in heart transplant recipients treated with rapamycin.

Michael Zakliczynski1, Jerzy Nozynski, Alfred Kocher, Maria K Lizak, Helena Zakliczynska, Roman Przybylski, Jacek Wojarski, Marian Zembala.   

Abstract

The aim of this retrospective analysis was to assess the influence of rapamycin (RAPA) used perioperatively on surgical complications in heart transplant recipients. The study group consisted of 28 heart transplant recipients (26M/2F, 49.2+/-11 years) receiving 15 mg of RAPA before operation, 10 mg of RAPA on the first postoperative day (POD) and 5 mg daily (n=20) thereafter, or 5 mg daily starting on POD 2 (n=8), until the introduction of cyclosporine-A. A matched historical control group was composed of 28 patients (26M/2F, 49.7+/-9 years) receiving cyclosporine-A from POD 1. We compared a number of surgical complications and reinterventions among groups. Statistical significance was assessed using the chi-square test and the Mann-Whitney U-test. There were 16 (57%) patients in the study group vs. six (21%) in the control group requiring reintervention (p=0.014). Pericardial tamponade decompression was performed in seven (25%) vs. zero patients, and sternum refixation in seven (25%) vs. zero patients (p=0.015). None of the wounds was infected. The overall drainage volume was 4,213+/-5,996 vs. 1,911+/-1,728 mL (p=NS). The frequencies of biopsy-proven rejection and infection were comparable, except lower cytomegalovirus infection rates in the study group: three (11%) vs. 11 (39%) for the control group (p=0.023). The use of RAPA in the perioperative period of heart transplantation increases the risk of surgical wound-healing complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17537118     DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2007.00232.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wound Repair Regen        ISSN: 1067-1927            Impact factor:   3.617


  7 in total

1.  Free tissue transfer for head and neck reconstruction in solid organ transplant patients.

Authors:  Matthew W Miller; Nichole R Dean; Steven B Cannady; Eben L Rosenthal; Mark K Wax
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 3.147

Review 2.  Effects of immunosuppressive therapy on wound healing.

Authors:  Roshan Bootun
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Postoperative complications associated with perioperative sirolimus prior to pediatric cardiac retransplantation.

Authors:  Jason F Goldberg; Aamir Jeewa; William J Dreyer; Gerald J Adams; Antonio G Cabrera; Jack F Price; Jeffrey S Heinle; Susan W Denfield
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2014-01

4.  Studies Introducing Costimulation Blockade for Vascularized Composite Allografts in Nonhuman Primates.

Authors:  A M Freitas; K P Samy; A B Farris; F V Leopardi; M Song; L Stempora; E A Strobert; J A Jenkins; A D Kirk; L C Cendales
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  Impaired lower extremity wound healing secondary to sirolimus after kidney transplantation.

Authors:  J George Devries; Rachel C Collier; Jeffrey A Niezgoda; Shawn Sanicola; John P Simanonok
Journal:  J Am Col Certif Wound Spec       Date:  2009-06-23

Review 6.  Heart transplantation: review.

Authors:  Sandrigo Mangini; Bárbara Rubim Alves; Odílson Marcos Silvestre; Philippe Vieira Pires; Lucas José Tachotti Pires; Milena Novaes Cardoso Curiati; Fernando Bacal
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

7.  mTOR Inhibition by Everolimus Does Not Impair Closure of Punch Biopsy Wounds in Renal Transplant Patients.

Authors:  Shelley B Dutt; Josephine Gonzales; Megan Boyett; Anne Costanzo; Peggy P Han; Steven Steinberg; Dianne B McKay; Julie M Jameson
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2017-03-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.