OBJECTIVES: To determine the risk of disability in individuals with coexisting visual and cognitive impairment and to compare the magnitude of risk associated with visual impairment, cognitive impairment, or the multimorbidity. DESIGN: Prospective cohort. SETTING: North Carolina. PARTICIPANTS: Three thousand eight hundred seventy-eight participants in the North Carolina Established Populations for the Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly with nonmissing visual status, cognitive status, and disability status data at baseline MEASUREMENTS: Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (cognitive impairment defined as > or =4 errors), self reported visual acuity (visual impairment defined as inability to see well enough to recognize a friend across the street or to read newspaper print), demographic and health-related variables, disability status (activities of daily living (ADLs), instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs), mobility), death, and time to nursing home placement. RESULTS: Participants with coexisting visual and cognitive impairment were at greater risk of IADL disability (odds ratio (OR)=6.50, 95% confidence interval (CI)=4.34-9.75), mobility disability (OR=4.04, 95% CI=2.49-6.54), ADL disability (OR=2.84, 95% CI=1.87-4.32), and incident ADL disability (OR=3.66, 95%, CI=2.36-5.65). In each case, the estimated OR associated with the multimorbidity was greater than the estimated OR associated with visual or cognitive impairment alone, a pattern that was not observed for other adverse outcomes assessed. No significant interactions were observed between cognitive impairment and visual impairment as predictors of disability status. CONCLUSION: Individuals with coexisting visual impairment and cognitive impairment are at high risk of disability, with each condition contributing additively to disability risk. Further study is needed to improve functional trajectories in patients with this prevalent multimorbidity. When visual or cognitive impairment is present, efforts to maximize the other function may be beneficial.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the risk of disability in individuals with coexisting visual and cognitive impairment and to compare the magnitude of risk associated with visual impairment, cognitive impairment, or the multimorbidity. DESIGN: Prospective cohort. SETTING: North Carolina. PARTICIPANTS: Three thousand eight hundred seventy-eight participants in the North Carolina Established Populations for the Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly with nonmissing visual status, cognitive status, and disability status data at baseline MEASUREMENTS: Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (cognitive impairment defined as > or =4 errors), self reported visual acuity (visual impairment defined as inability to see well enough to recognize a friend across the street or to read newspaper print), demographic and health-related variables, disability status (activities of daily living (ADLs), instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs), mobility), death, and time to nursing home placement. RESULTS:Participants with coexisting visual and cognitive impairment were at greater risk of IADL disability (odds ratio (OR)=6.50, 95% confidence interval (CI)=4.34-9.75), mobility disability (OR=4.04, 95% CI=2.49-6.54), ADL disability (OR=2.84, 95% CI=1.87-4.32), and incident ADL disability (OR=3.66, 95%, CI=2.36-5.65). In each case, the estimated OR associated with the multimorbidity was greater than the estimated OR associated with visual or cognitive impairment alone, a pattern that was not observed for other adverse outcomes assessed. No significant interactions were observed between cognitive impairment and visual impairment as predictors of disability status. CONCLUSION: Individuals with coexisting visual impairment and cognitive impairment are at high risk of disability, with each condition contributing additively to disability risk. Further study is needed to improve functional trajectories in patients with this prevalent multimorbidity. When visual or cognitive impairment is present, efforts to maximize the other function may be beneficial.
Authors: Heather E Whitson; Rahul Malhotra; Angelique Chan; David B Matchar; Truls Østbye Journal: Asia Pac J Public Health Date: 2012-04-24 Impact factor: 1.399
Authors: Heather E Whitson; Deidra Ansah; Diane Whitaker; Guy Potter; Scott W Cousins; Heather MacDonald; Carl F Pieper; Lawrence Landerman; David C Steffens; Harvey J Cohen Journal: Arch Gerontol Geriatr Date: 2009-05-07 Impact factor: 3.250
Authors: D Diane Zheng; Bonnielin K Swenor; Sharon L Christ; Sheila K West; Byron L Lam; David J Lee Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis; Can-Lan Sun; William P Tew; Supriya Gupta Mohile; Ajeet Gajra; Heidi D Klepin; Cynthia Owusu; Cary Philip Gross; Hyman B Muss; Stuart M Lichtman; Andrew E Chapman; Harvey Jay Cohen; William Dale; Heeyoung Kim; Simone Fernandes; Vani Katheria; Arti Hurria Journal: Cancer Date: 2018-05-24 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Heather E Whitson; Lawrence R Landerman; Anne B Newman; Linda P Fried; Carl F Pieper; Harvey Jay Cohen Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2010-07-30 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: William James Deardorff; Phillip L Liu; Richard Sloane; Courtney Van Houtven; Carl F Pieper; Susan Nicole Hastings; Harvey J Cohen; Heather E Whitson Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2019-03-29 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: M Austin Coker; Carrie E Huisingh; Gerald McGwin; Russell W Read; Mark W Swanson; Laura E Dreer; Dawn K DeCarlo; Lindsay Gregg; Cynthia Owsley Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2018-04-01 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Heather E Whitson; Diane Whitaker; Guy Potter; Eleanor McConnell; Fay Tripp; Linda L Sanders; Kelly W Muir; Harvey J Cohen; Scott W Cousins Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 7.389