Literature DB >> 17536198

Spatial unmasking and binaural advantage for children with normal hearing, a cochlear implant and a hearing aid, and bilateral implants.

Mansze Mok1, Karyn L Galvin, Richard C Dowell, Colette M McKay.   

Abstract

The aims of this study were to: (1) determine if spatial unmasking existed and differed for children with normal hearing, a hearing aid and a cochlear implant (CIHA), and bilateral implants (BICI); (2) determine if binaural advantage and headshadow effect differed between children with CIHA and BICI. Results indicated that most of the CIHA and BICI children demonstrated spatial unmasking, though to a lesser degree than children with normal hearing. Results also indicated that the children with BICI demonstrated greater headshadow effect than those with CIHA. The CIHA and BICI children also differed in binaural advantage, which could be due to the differences in headshadow effect and in detection abilities with the hearing aid versus the second implant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17536198     DOI: 10.1159/000103210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiol Neurootol        ISSN: 1420-3030            Impact factor:   1.854


  11 in total

1.  The relative phonetic contributions of a cochlear implant and residual acoustic hearing to bimodal speech perception.

Authors:  Benjamin M Sheffield; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Clinical selection criteria for a second cochlear implant for bimodal listeners.

Authors:  Yang-soo Yoon; You-Ree Shin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Comparison of bimodal and bilateral cochlear implant users on speech recognition with competing talker, music perception, affective prosody discrimination, and talker identification.

Authors:  Helen E Cullington; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Factors influencing speech perception in noise for 5-year-old children using hearing aids or cochlear implants.

Authors:  Teresa Yc Ching; Vicky W Zhang; Christopher Flynn; Lauren Burns; Laura Button; Sanna Hou; Karen McGhie; Patricia Van Buynder
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 5.  Bilateral cochlear implants in children: Effects of auditory experience and deprivation on auditory perception.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky; Karen Gordon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-01-30       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Binaural fusion and listening effort in children who use bilateral cochlear implants: a psychoacoustic and pupillometric study.

Authors:  Morrison M Steel; Blake C Papsin; Karen A Gordon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Cortical organization restored by cochlear implantation in young children with single sided deafness.

Authors:  Melissa Jane Polonenko; Karen Ann Gordon; Sharon Lynn Cushing; Blake Croll Papsin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Electro-haptic stimulation enhances speech recognition in spatially separated noise for cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Mark D Fletcher; Haoheng Song; Samuel W Perry
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of bilateral cochlear implants for children with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss in both ears in Singapore.

Authors:  Li-Jen Cheng; Swee Sung Soon; David Bin-Chia Wu; Hong Ju; Kwong Ng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Limiting asymmetric hearing improves benefits of bilateral hearing in children using cochlear implants.

Authors:  Melissa Jane Polonenko; Blake Croll Papsin; Karen Ann Gordon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.