UNLABELLED: We evaluated the predictive value of PET using the hypoxia tracer (18)F-fluoroazomycin arabinoside ((18)F-FAZA) for success of radiotherapy in combination with tirapazamine, a specific cytotoxin for hypoxic cells. METHODS: Imaging was performed on EMT6 tumor-bearing nude mice before allocating mice into 4 groups: radiochemotherapy (RCT: 8 fractions of 4.5 Gy within 4 d combined with tirapazamine, 14 mg/kg), radiotherapy alone (RT), chemotherapy alone (tirapazamine) (CHT), or control. Treatment success was assessed by several tumor growth assays, including tumor growth time from 70 to 500 microL and absolute growth delay (aGD). The median pretreatment (18)F-FAZA tumor-to-background ratio served as a discriminator between "hypoxic" and "normoxic" tumors. RESULTS: The mean tumor growth was significantly accelerated in hypoxic control tumors (growth time from 70 to 500 microL, 11.0 d) compared with normoxic control tumors (growth time from 70 to 500 microL, 15.6 d). Whereas RT delayed tumor growth regardless of the level of hypoxia, an additive beneficial therapeutic effect of tirapazamine to RT was observed only in hypoxic tumors (aGD, 12.9 d) but not in normoxic tumors (aGD, 6.0 d). CONCLUSION: This study provides compelling evidence that hypoxia imaging using (18)F-FAZA PET is able to predict the success of RCT of tumor-bearing mice using the hypoxia-activated chemotherapeutic agent tirapazamine. Pretreatment (18)F-FAZA PET, therefore, offers a way for the individualization of tumor treatment involving radiation. The data suggest that by reserving hypoxia-directed therapy to tumors with high (18)F-FAZA uptake, improvement of the therapeutic ratio is possible, as the therapeutic effect of tirapazamine seems to be restricted to hypoxic tumors.
UNLABELLED: We evaluated the predictive value of PET using the hypoxia tracer (18)F-fluoroazomycin arabinoside ((18)F-FAZA) for success of radiotherapy in combination with tirapazamine, a specific cytotoxin for hypoxic cells. METHODS: Imaging was performed on EMT6 tumor-bearing nude mice before allocating mice into 4 groups: radiochemotherapy (RCT: 8 fractions of 4.5 Gy within 4 d combined with tirapazamine, 14 mg/kg), radiotherapy alone (RT), chemotherapy alone (tirapazamine) (CHT), or control. Treatment success was assessed by several tumor growth assays, including tumor growth time from 70 to 500 microL and absolute growth delay (aGD). The median pretreatment (18)F-FAZA tumor-to-background ratio served as a discriminator between "hypoxic" and "normoxic" tumors. RESULTS: The mean tumor growth was significantly accelerated in hypoxic control tumors (growth time from 70 to 500 microL, 11.0 d) compared with normoxic control tumors (growth time from 70 to 500 microL, 15.6 d). Whereas RT delayed tumor growth regardless of the level of hypoxia, an additive beneficial therapeutic effect of tirapazamine to RT was observed only in hypoxic tumors (aGD, 12.9 d) but not in normoxic tumors (aGD, 6.0 d). CONCLUSION: This study provides compelling evidence that hypoxia imaging using (18)F-FAZA PET is able to predict the success of RCT of tumor-bearing mice using the hypoxia-activated chemotherapeutic agent tirapazamine. Pretreatment (18)F-FAZA PET, therefore, offers a way for the individualization of tumor treatment involving radiation. The data suggest that by reserving hypoxia-directed therapy to tumors with high (18)F-FAZA uptake, improvement of the therapeutic ratio is possible, as the therapeutic effect of tirapazamine seems to be restricted to hypoxic tumors.
Authors: Craig J Galbán; Stefanie Galbán; Marcian E Van Dort; Gary D Luker; Mahaveer S Bhojani; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Brian D Ross Journal: Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci Date: 2010 Impact factor: 3.622
Authors: Anna-Maria Rolle; Peter T Soboslay; Gerald Reischl; Wolfgang H Hoffmann; Bernd J Pichler; Stefan Wiehr Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Quynh-Thu Le; Richard Fisher; Kelly S Oliner; Richard J Young; Hongbin Cao; Christina Kong; Edward Graves; Rodney J Hicks; Grant A McArthur; Lester Peters; Brian O'Sullivan; Amato Giaccia; Danny Rischin Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-03-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Joël Castelli; A Depeursinge; A Devillers; B Campillo-Gimenez; Y Dicente; J O Prior; E Chajon; F Jegoux; C Sire; O Acosta; E Gherga; X Sun; B De Bari; J Bourhis; R de Crevoisier Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-08-21 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Xia Shao; Raphaël Hoareau; Brian G Hockley; Louis J M Tluczek; Bradford D Henderson; Henry C Padgett; Peter J H Scott Journal: J Labelled Comp Radiopharm Date: 2011-05-30 Impact factor: 1.921
Authors: M Busk; L S Mortensen; M Nordsmark; J Overgaard; S Jakobsen; K V Hansen; J Theil; J F Kallehauge; F P D'Andrea; T Steiniche; M R Horsman Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2012-10-18 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Rob A Cairns; Kevin L Bennewith; Edward E Graves; Amato J Giaccia; Daniel T Chang; Nicholas C Denko Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-11-17 Impact factor: 12.531