Literature DB >> 17535981

Unexpected events during the intrahospital transport of critically ill patients.

Jonathan P N Papson1, Kassandra L Russell, David McD Taylor.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine unexpected events (UEs) that occur during the intrahospital transport of critically ill emergency department patients.
METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of consecutive intrahospital transports between March 2003 and June 2004. The escorting emergency physician completed the data collection document either during or immediately after the transport. This document detailed equipment-related UEs, patient instability and invasive line-related UEs, whether the UEs required intervention, and whether the UEs were potentially life threatening (serious UEs).
RESULTS: Of 339 transports observed, 230 (67.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 62.6% to 72.7%) were associated with 604 UEs. Overall, there was a median of 1.0 UE per transport (range, 0-16). There were 277 (45.9%; 95% CI = 41.8% to 49.9%) UEs related to equipment, 158 (26.2%; 95% CI = 22.7% to 29.9%) related to patient instability, 156 (25.8%; 95% CI = 22.4% to 29.6%) related to equipment lines, and 13 (2.2%, 95% CI = 1.2% to 3.8%) miscellaneous UEs. The most common UEs were oxygen saturation probe failures, lead and line tangles, hypotension, and the wearing off of sedation and/or paralysis. Most UEs (478 [79.1%]; 95% CI = 75.6% to 82.3%) required an intervention. Emergency physicians had a significantly lower UE rate than residents. Thirty serious UEs occurred; 5.0% (95% CI = 3.4% to 7.1%) of UEs and 8.9% (95% CI = 6.2% to 12.5%) of transports were associated with a serious UE. The most common were severe hypotension, decreasing consciousness requiring intubation, and increased intracranial pressure.
CONCLUSIONS: Unexpected events during the intrahospital transport of critically ill patients from the emergency department are common and can be potentially life threatening. Transporting physician experience is associated with UE rate. Strict adherence to and review of existing transport guidelines is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17535981     DOI: 10.1197/j.aem.2007.02.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  48 in total

1.  Diagnostic yield and safety of CT scans in ICU.

Authors:  Marine Aliaga; Jean-Marie Forel; Sophie De Bourmont; Boris Jung; Guillemette Thomas; Martin Mahul; Magali Bisbal; Stephanie Nougaret; Sami Hraiech; Antoine Roch; Kathia Chaumoitre; Samir Jaber; Marc Gainnier; Laurent Papazian
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  [Tele-emergency physician : New care concept in emergency medicine].

Authors:  Viola Koncz; Thorsten Kohlmann; Stefan Bielmeier; Bert Urban; Stephan Prückner
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Defining Significant Events for Neonatal and Pediatric Transport: Results of a Combined Delphi and Consensus Meeting Process.

Authors:  A C Gunz; J D McNally; H Whyte; K O'Hearn; J R Foster; M J Parker; S Dhanani
Journal:  J Pediatr Intensive Care       Date:  2016-12-28

4.  Endovascular Rescue Therapy for Refractory Vasospasm: When and How?

Authors:  M Weiss; G A Schubert
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Intrahospital transport of mechanically ventilated intensive care patients using new equipment attached to a transfer board.

Authors:  Yosuke Matsumura; Taka-Aki Nakada; Yosuke Hayashi; Taku Oshima; Shigeto Oda
Journal:  Acute Med Surg       Date:  2015-04-28

6.  Learning from incident reports in the Australian medical imaging setting: handover and communication errors.

Authors:  N Hannaford; C Mandel; C Crock; K Buckley; F Magrabi; M Ong; S Allen; T Schultz
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Risks of Routinely Clamping External Ventricular Drains for Intrahospital Transport in Neurocritically Ill Cerebrovascular Patients.

Authors:  Nophanan Chaikittisilpa; Abhijit V Lele; Vivian H Lyons; Bala G Nair; Shu-Fang Newman; Patricia A Blissitt; Monica S Vavilala
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 8.  Recommendations for the intra-hospital transport of critically ill patients.

Authors:  Benoît Fanara; Cyril Manzon; Olivier Barbot; Thibaut Desmettre; Gilles Capellier
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Multiple intra-hospital transports during relocation to a new critical care unit.

Authors:  R-A O'Leary; I Conrick-Martin; C O'Loughlin; M-R Curran; B Marsh
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 1.568

10.  Intra-hospital transport of brain-injured patients: a prospective, observational study.

Authors:  Edoardo Picetti; Marta Velia Antonini; Maria Chiara Lucchetti; Serena Pucciarelli; Adriana Valente; Ilaria Rossi; Paolo Schiavi; Franco Servadei; Maria Luisa Caspani; Mario Mergoni
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.210

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.