Literature DB >> 17534136

Comparison of accuracy and precision between frame-based and frameless stereotactic navigation for deep brain stimulation electrode implantation.

Hjálmar Bjartmarz1, Stig Rehncrona.   

Abstract

The accuracy and precision of frameless neuronavigation as compared to conventional frame-based stereotaxy for implantation of deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes were studied in 14 patients with essential tremor. DBS electrodes were implanted bilaterally in the ventrolateral thalamus [ventrointermediate nucleus (VIM)] in one procedure. Frameless neuronavigation was used on one side and the conventional frame-based technique on the other. Targeting was guided by MRI and CT imaging. Intraoperative stereotactic plain X-ray verified final electrode positions and electrode deviations from the planned target were measured. Clinical outcome was evaluated with the Essential Tremor Rating Scale. Thirteen of the patients were eligible for measuring electrode deviations and 10 of them were available for a clinical follow-up. Electrode deviations from target were larger using the frameless technique in the medial-lateral (x: 1.9 +/- 1.3 mm) and anterior-posterior (y:0.9 +/- 0.8 mm) directions as compared to the frame-based technique (x: 0.5 +/- 0.5 and y: 0.4 +/- 0.4 mm) but similar in the superior-inferior direction (z). The vector of deviation was 2.5 +/- 1.4 mm with the frameless technique and 1.2 +/- 0.6 with the frame-based technique. The differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05-0.001). The dispersion was larger with the frameless technique as represented by the larger standard deviations in all three planes. At clinical follow-ups, tremor reduction was similar irrespective of the implantation technique. It is concluded that conventional frame-based stereotaxy has higher accuracy/precision for hitting a small brain target than the frameless technique. However, the difference is relatively small and does not influence the clinical result of DBS electrode implantations in the VIM when treating tremor. Copyright (c) 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17534136     DOI: 10.1159/000103262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg        ISSN: 1011-6125            Impact factor:   1.875


  36 in total

1.  Calibration of the motor-assisted robotic stereotaxy system: MARS.

Authors:  Maximilian Heinig; Ulrich G Hofmann; Alexander Schlaefer
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 2.  Stereotactic implantation of deep brain stimulation electrodes: a review of technical systems, methods and emerging tools.

Authors:  Simone Hemm; Karin Wårdell
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Comparison of F-18 FET-PET with F-18 FDG-PET for biopsy planning of non-contrast-enhancing gliomas.

Authors:  Michail Plotkin; C Blechschmidt; G Auf; F Nyuyki; L Geworski; T Denecke; W Brenner; F Stockhammer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  [Neurosurgical standards in deep brain stimulation : consensus recommendations of the German Deep Brain Stimulation Association].

Authors:  J Voges; K Kiening; J K Krauss; G Nikkhah; J Vesper
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.214

5.  Clinical accuracy of a customized stereotactic platform for deep brain stimulation after accounting for brain shift.

Authors:  Pierre-François D'Haese; Srivatsan Pallavaram; Peter E Konrad; Joseph Neimat; J Michael Fitzpatrick; Benoit M Dawant
Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 1.875

6.  Accuracy of Intraoperative Computed Tomography during Deep Brain Stimulation Procedures: Comparison with Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Maarten Bot; Pepijn van den Munckhof; Roy Bakay; Glenn Stebbins; Leo Verhagen Metman
Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 1.875

7.  Effect of MR distortion on targeting for deep-brain stimulation.

Authors:  Ramya Balachandran; E Brian Welch; Benoit M Dawant; J Michael Fitzpatrick
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Electrophysiologic Validation of Diffusion Tensor Imaging Tractography during Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery.

Authors:  V A Coenen; C Jenkner; C R Honey; B Mädler
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 9.  Brain-focussed ultrasound: what's the "FUS" all about? A review of current and emerging neurological applications.

Authors:  Laure Bretsztajn; Wladyslaw Gedroyc
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 10.  Surgical treatment of Parkinson's disease: patients, targets, devices, and approaches.

Authors:  Aparna Wagle Shukla; Michael Scott Okun
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 7.620

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.