Literature DB >> 17533529

Thyroid dose during neurointerventional procedures: does lead shielding reduce the dose?

C P Shortt1, N F Fanning, L Malone, J Thornton, P Brennan, M J Lee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess radiation dose to the thyroid in patients undergoing neurointerventional procedures and to evaluate dose reduction to the thyroid by lead shielding. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A randomized patient study was undertaken to evaluate the dose reduction by thyroid lead shields and assess their practicality in a clinical setting. Sixty-five patients attending for endovascular treatment of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) and aneurysms were randomized into one of 2 groups a) No Thyroid Shield and b) Thyroid Lead Shield. Two thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) were placed over the thyroid gland (1 on each side) at constant positions on each patient in both groups. A thyroid lead shield (Pb eq. 0.5 mm) was placed around the neck of patients in the thyroid lead shield group after the neurointerventional radiologist had obtained satisfactory working access above the neck. The total dose-area-product (DAP) value, number and type of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) runs and fluoroscopy time were recorded for all patients.
RESULTS: Of the 72 patients who initially attended for neurointerventional procedures, 7 were excluded due to failure to consent or because of procedures involving access to the external carotid circulation. Of the remaining 65 who were randomized, a further 9 were excluded due to; procedureabandonment, unfeasible shield placement or shield interference with the procedure. Patient demographics included mean age of 47.9 yrs (15-74), F:M=1.4:1. Mean fluoroscopy time was 25.9 min. Mean DAP value was 13,134.8 cGy x cm(2) and mean number of DSA runs was 13.4. The mean relative thyroid doses were significantly different (p< 0.001) between the unshielded (7.23 mSv/cGy2 x 105) and shielded groups (3.77 mSv/cGy2 x 105). A mean thyroid dose reduction of 48% was seen in the shielded group versus the unshielded group.
CONCLUSION: Considerable doses to the thyroid are incurred during neurointerventional procedures, highlighting the need for increased awareness of patient radiation protection. Thyroid lead shielding yields significant radiation protection, is inexpensive and when not obscuring the field of view, should be used routinely.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17533529     DOI: 10.1007/s00270-007-9093-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol        ISSN: 0174-1551            Impact factor:   2.740


  5 in total

Review 1.  Exposing the thyroid to radiation: a review of its current extent, risks, and implications.

Authors:  Bridget Sinnott; Elaine Ron; Arthur B Schneider
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 19.871

2.  Effect of leaded glasses and thyroid shielding on cone beam CT radiation dose in an adult female phantom.

Authors:  A D Goren; R D Prins; L T Dauer; B Quinn; A Al-Najjar; R D Faber; G Patchell; I Branets; D C Colosi
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Radiation Dose to the Thyroid and Gonads in Patients Undergoing Cardiac CT Angiography.

Authors:  Hamid Behroozi; Mohammad Davoodi; Shahriar Aghasi
Journal:  Iran J Radiol       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 0.212

Review 4.  Radiation safety: a focus on lead aprons and thyroid shields in interventional pain management.

Authors:  Bo Kyung Cheon; Cho Long Kim; Ka Ram Kim; Min Hye Kang; Jeong Ae Lim; Nam Sik Woo; Ka Young Rhee; Hae Kyoung Kim; Jae Hun Kim
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2018-10-01

5.  Personalized Radiation Attenuating Materials for Gastrointestinal Mucosal Protection.

Authors:  James D Byrne; Cameron C Young; Jacqueline N Chu; Jennifer Pursley; Mu Xian Chen; Adam J Wentworth; Annie Feng; Ameya R Kirtane; Kyla A Remillard; Cindy I Hancox; Mandar S Bhagwat; Nicole Machado; Tiffany Hua; Siddartha M Tamang; Joy E Collins; Keiko Ishida; Alison Hayward; Sarah L Becker; Samantha K Edgington; Jonathan D Schoenfeld; William R Jeck; Chin Hur; Giovanni Traverso
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 16.806

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.