OBJECTIVE: To investigate the dimensionality and construct validity of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the upper extremity by using Rasch analysis. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of pooled data from 2 existing datasets: a randomized therapeutic exercise clinical trial and a cohort longitudinal study of stroke recovery. SETTING: University research center. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 512 subjects, ages 69.8+/-11.1 years, who were 0 to 145 days poststroke. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Dimensionality was examined with principal components analysis and Rasch item-fit statistics. The Rasch-derived item hierarchy was examined for consistency with the expected course of poststroke upper-extremity recovery suggested by the reflex-hierarchical conceptual model underlying the assessment. RESULTS: Factor loadings and item infit statistics suggested that the 3 reflex items were empirically disconnected from other assessment items. The reflex items were removed. The modified 30-item assessment showed a unidimensional structure. The Rasch-item-difficulty order was not consistent with the expected item order. CONCLUSIONS: The items testing resting-state reflexes may threaten the assessment's dimensionality. With reflex items removed, the assessment is a unidimensional measure of volitional movement. The Rasch-generated item-difficulty order challenges the hierarchical structure implied by the instrument's underlying conceptual framework.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the dimensionality and construct validity of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the upper extremity by using Rasch analysis. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of pooled data from 2 existing datasets: a randomized therapeutic exercise clinical trial and a cohort longitudinal study of stroke recovery. SETTING: University research center. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 512 subjects, ages 69.8+/-11.1 years, who were 0 to 145 days poststroke. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Dimensionality was examined with principal components analysis and Rasch item-fit statistics. The Rasch-derived item hierarchy was examined for consistency with the expected course of poststroke upper-extremity recovery suggested by the reflex-hierarchical conceptual model underlying the assessment. RESULTS: Factor loadings and item infit statistics suggested that the 3 reflex items were empirically disconnected from other assessment items. The reflex items were removed. The modified 30-item assessment showed a unidimensional structure. The Rasch-item-difficulty order was not consistent with the expected item order. CONCLUSIONS: The items testing resting-state reflexes may threaten the assessment's dimensionality. With reflex items removed, the assessment is a unidimensional measure of volitional movement. The Rasch-generated item-difficulty order challenges the hierarchical structure implied by the instrument's underlying conceptual framework.
Authors: Chitralakshmi K Balasubramanian; Chih-Ying Li; Mark G Bowden; Pamela W Duncan; Steven A Kautz; Craig A Velozo Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2015-12-29 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Leonard Matheson; John Mayer; Vert Mooney; Andrew Sarkin; Theodore Dreisinger; Joe Verna; Scott Leggett Journal: J Occup Rehabil Date: 2007-11-20
Authors: Cheryl Carrico; Philip M Westgate; Elizabeth Salmon Powell; Kenneth C Chelette; Laurie Nichols; L Creed Pettigrew; Lumy Sawaki Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 2.159
Authors: Michelle Woodbury; Craig A Velozo; Paul A Thompson; Kathye Light; Gitendra Uswatte; Edward Taub; Carolee J Winstein; David Morris; Sarah Blanton; Deborah S Nichols-Larsen; Steven L Wolf Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2010-07-08 Impact factor: 3.919
Authors: Kathleen Y Haaland; Sydney Y Schaefer; Robert T Knight; John Adair; Alvaro Magalhaes; Joseph Sadek; Robert L Sainburg Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2009-05-29 Impact factor: 1.972