Literature DB >> 17532256

Evaluation of general practitioner's time investment during a store-and-forward teledermatology consultation.

Rosanne M Berghout1, Nina Eminović, Nicolette F de Keizer, Erwin Birnie.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
OBJECTIVE: Introduction of teledermatology in general practice changes responsibilities and workloads of general practitioners (GPs) and dermatologists. We investigated the time investment of GPs as well as the relative share of the separate teledermatology activities during a store-and-forward teledermatology consultation.
METHODS: Sixty-four teledermatology consultations (eight GPs x eight patients) were conducted in a laboratory setting. The starting and ending time of each consultation and of five separate teledermatology activities were recorded by independent observers. The impact of several GP, patient and consultation characteristics on the calculated durations was investigated with repeated measurements analysis.
RESULTS: The mean duration of a teledermatology consultation was 11:32 min (range 7:02-26:44 min). The activity 'filling out electronic referral form' was the most time consuming teledermatology activity (3:12 min; 28%). Most time was spent on non-TD related consultation activities, e.g. taking medical history (4:43 min; 41%). The first of the eight consultations (p<0.001) and consultations with female patients (p=0.032) took on average more time than subsequent consultations (first consultations 13:42 min (male patients) and 17:03 min (female patients), and subsequent consultations 9:56 min (male patients) and 11:08 min (female patients)).
CONCLUSIONS: Usage of store-and-forward teledermatology increases the average duration of a GP consultation with at least three and a half minutes. Further integration of teledermatology applications and electronic patients' records may reduce the total duration of a consultation and increase acceptance of teledermatology in general practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17532256     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Inform        ISSN: 1386-5056            Impact factor:   4.046


  6 in total

1.  Citation analysis of the prognosis of Haux et al. for the year 2013.

Authors:  Jürgen Stausberg
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Cost-effectiveness of Skin Cancer Referral and Consultation Using Teledermoscopy in Australia.

Authors:  Centaine L Snoswell; Liam J Caffery; Jennifer A Whitty; H Peter Soyer; Louisa G Gordon
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 10.282

3.  Determining patient preferences for remote monitoring.

Authors:  Nuri Basoglu; Tugrul U Daim; Umit Topacan
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  The workload of web-based consultations with atopic eczema patients at home.

Authors:  Thomas Rg Schopf; Roald Bolle; Terje Solvoll
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2010-03-12

Review 5.  A cost minimisation analysis in teledermatology: model-based approach.

Authors:  Nina Eminović; Marcel G Dijkgraaf; Rosanne M Berghout; Astrid H Prins; Patrick Je Bindels; Nicolette F de Keizer
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Time Required to Create a Referral in Various Store-and-Forward Telemedicine Networks.

Authors:  Richard Wootton; Barry O'Kane
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2019-09-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.