Literature DB >> 17532075

Pupillary responses during lexical decisions vary with word frequency but not emotional valence.

Lars Kuchinke1, Melissa L-H Võ, Markus Hofmann, Arthur M Jacobs.   

Abstract

Pupillary responses were examined during a lexical decision task (LDT). Word frequency (high and low frequency words) and emotional valence (positive, neutral and negative words) were varied as experimental factors incidental to the subjects. Both variables significantly affected lexical decision performance and an interaction effect was observed. The behavioral results suggest that manipulating word frequency may partly account for the heterogeneous literature findings regarding emotional valence effects in the LDT. In addition, a difference between high and low frequency words was observed in the pupil data as reflected by higher peak pupil dilations for low frequency words, whereas pupillary responses to emotionally valenced words did not differ. This result was further supported by means of a principal component analysis on the pupil data, in which a late component was shown only to be affected by word frequency. Consistent with previous findings, word frequency was found to affect the resource allocation towards processing of the letter string, while emotionally valenced words tend to facilitate processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17532075     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  42 in total

1.  Systematic influence of gaze position on pupil size measurement: analysis and correction.

Authors:  Benjamin Gagl; Stefan Hawelka; Florian Hutzler
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2011-12

2.  Eyes wide open: Pupil size as a proxy for inhibition in the masked-priming paradigm.

Authors:  Jason Geller; Mary L Still; Alison L Morris
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-05

3.  Does familiarity or conflict account for performance in the word-stem completion task? Evidence from behavioural and event-related-potential data.

Authors:  Florian Klonek; Sascha Tamm; Markus J Hofmann; Arthur M Jacobs
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-11-27

4.  Emotion words and categories: evidence from lexical decision.

Authors:  Graham G Scott; Patrick J O'Donnell; Sara C Sereno
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2013-11-21

5.  Memory strength and specificity revealed by pupillometry.

Authors:  Megan H Papesh; Stephen D Goldinger; Michael C Hout
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 2.997

6.  Affective processing within 1/10th of a second: High arousal is necessary for early facilitative processing of negative but not positive words.

Authors:  Markus J Hofmann; Lars Kuchinke; Sascha Tamm; Melissa L-H Võ; Arthur M Jacobs
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Processing of emotion words by patients with autism spectrum disorders: evidence from reaction times and EEG.

Authors:  Alina Lartseva; Ton Dijkstra; Cornelis C Kan; Jan K Buitelaar
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2014-11

8.  Pupil Dilation Reflects the Creation and Retrieval of Memories.

Authors:  Stephen D Goldinger; Megan H Papesh
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-03-20

9.  Pupil-BLAH-metry: cognitive effort in speech planning reflected by pupil dilation.

Authors:  Megan H Papesh; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Pupil size varies with word listening and response selection difficulty in older adults with hearing loss.

Authors:  Stefanie E Kuchinsky; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Kenneth I Vaden; Stephanie L Cute; Larry E Humes; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 4.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.