Literature DB >> 17531989

Ovarian response and pregnancy outcome in poor-responder women: a randomized controlled trial on the effect of luteinizing hormone supplementation on in vitro fertilization cycles.

Gorka Barrenetxea1, Jon Ander Agirregoikoa, María Rosario Jiménez, Arantza Lopez de Larruzea, Teresa Ganzabal, Koldo Carbonero.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively assess the effect of using a combination of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) and recombinant luteinizing hormone (rLH) on ovarian stimulation parameters and treatment outcome among poor-responder patients.
DESIGN: Prospective randomized trial.
SETTING: University-associated private medical center. PATIENT(S): Eighty-four patients who had a basal FSH level of >or=10 mIU/mL, who were >or=40 years of age, and who were undergoing their first IVF cycle participated in this controlled trial. INTERVENTION(S): Patients were randomly allocated into two study groups: group A, in which ovarian stimulation included GnRH analogue and rFSH and rLH, and group B, in which patients received GnRH analogue and rFSH without further LH addition. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Primary outcome measures included the ongoing pregnancy rate per retrieval and implantation rate per embryo transferred. The number of days of gonadotropin treatment, E(2) level on rHCG administration day, number of developed follicles, number of retrieved oocytes, number of normally fertilized zygotes (at the two-pronuclear [2PN] stage), cumulative embryo score, and number of transferred embryos were also evaluated. RESULT(S): The overall pregnancy rate was 22.61% (19 pregnancies among 84 couples). The pregnancy wastage rate was 30.00% in group A and 22.22% in group B. There were no differences in either primary or secondary end points. CONCLUSION(S): The results of this prospective and randomized trial show that the addition of rLH at a given time of follicular development produces no further benefit in the patient population of our study. A reduced ovarian response cannot be overcome by changes in the stimulation protocol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17531989     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.03.088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  24 in total

1.  Outcome of in vitro fertilization in patients with proven poor ovarian responsiveness after early vs. mid-follicular LH exposure: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Alberto Revelli; Alessandra Chiado'; Daniela Guidetti; Francesca Bongioanni; Valentina Rovei; Gianluca Gennarelli
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Fertility drugs and young-onset breast cancer: results from the Two Sister Study.

Authors:  Chunyuan Fei; Lisa A Deroo; Dale P Sandler; Clarice R Weinberg
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Diminished ovarian reserve in the United States assisted reproductive technology population: diagnostic trends among 181,536 cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System.

Authors:  Kate Devine; Sunni L Mumford; Mae Wu; Alan H DeCherney; Micah J Hill; Anthony Propst
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 4.  Preimplantation genetic screening: does it help or hinder IVF treatment and what is the role of the embryo?

Authors:  Kim Dao Ly; Ashok Agarwal; Zsolt Peter Nagy
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Effects of prolonging administration gonadotropin on unexpectedly poor ovarian responders undergoing in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Zhaolian Wei; Xianxia Cheng; Huirong Li; Yunxia Cao; Lin Cong; Ping Zhou; Jun Li
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 5.211

6.  Recombinant follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa in fertility treatment.

Authors:  Ahmed Gibreel; Siladitya Bhattacharya
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2010-02-04

Review 7.  Lutropin alfa.

Authors:  Sohita Dhillon; Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Early hCG addition to rFSH for ovarian stimulation in IVF provides better results and the cDNA copies of the hCG receptor may be an indicator of successful stimulation.

Authors:  Peter Drakakis; Dimitris Loutradis; Apostolos Beloukas; Vana Sypsa; Vasiliki Anastasiadou; George Kalofolias; Helen Arabatzi; Erasmia Kiapekou; Konstantinos Stefanidis; Dimitris Paraskevis; Antonis Makrigiannakis; Angelos Hatzakis; Aris Antsaklis
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 5.211

9.  Follicular fluid hormonal profile and cumulus cell gene expression in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with recombinant FSH: effects of recombinant LH administration.

Authors:  Marzia Barberi; Beatrice Ermini; Maria Beatrice Morelli; Michele Ermini; Sandra Cecconi; Rita Canipari
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 10.  Biological versus chronological ovarian age: implications for assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Carlo Alviggi; Peter Humaidan; Colin M Howles; Donald Tredway; Stephen G Hillier
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 5.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.