Literature DB >> 1752869

A conductive polymer sensor for measuring external finger forces.

T R Jensen1, R G Radwin, J G Webster.   

Abstract

This paper describes the construction and use of a durable and thin force sensor that can be attached to the palmar surface of the fingers and hands for studying the biomechanics of grasp and for use in hand injury rehabilitation. These force sensors were constructed using a modified commercially available conductive polymer pressure sensing element and installing an epoxy dome for directing applied forces through a 12 mm diameter active sensing area. The installation of an epoxy dome was effective for making the sensors insensitive to contact surfaces varying from 25 to 1100 mm2 and a 16 mm radius surface curved convex towards the finger. The completed sensors were only 1.8 mm thick and capable of being taped to the distal phalangeal finger pads. They were calibrated on the hand by pinching a strain gage dynamometer. The useful range was between 0 and 30 N with an accuracy of 1 N for both static loading and normal dynamic grasp activities. The sensor time constant was 0.54 ms for a step force input. Because of varying offset voltages every time the sensors were attached, these sensors should be calibrated on the hand before each use. The sensors were used for measuring finger forces during controlled pinching and lifting tasks, and during ordinary grasping activities, such as picking up a book or a box, where the useful force range and response for these sensors were adequate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1752869     DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(91)90310-j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  6 in total

1.  The influence of bolus volume and viscosity on anterior lingual force during the oral stage of swallowing.

Authors:  J L Miller; K L Watkin
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.438

2.  Multiaxis grip characteristics for varying handle diameters and effort.

Authors:  Curt B Irwin; Joseph D Towles; Robert G Radwin
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 2.888

3.  The effects of acute cortical somatosensory deafferentation on grip force control.

Authors:  Andrew G Richardson; Mark A Attiah; Jeffrey I Berman; H Isaac Chen; Xilin Liu; Milin Zhang; Jan Van der Spiegel; Timothy H Lucas
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  Effectiveness of supplemental grasp-force feedback in the presence of vision.

Authors:  M Zafar; C L Van Doren
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.079

5.  Effect of Contacting Surface on the Performance of Thin-Film Force and Pressure Sensors.

Authors:  Ka Po Maggie Tang; Kit Lun Yick; Pui Ling Li; Joanne Yip; King Hei Or; Kam Hong Chau
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Sensory Feedback Interferes with Mu Rhythm Based Detection of Motor Commands from Electroencephalographic Signals.

Authors:  Maximilian Hommelsen; Matthias Schneiders; Christian Schuld; Philipp Keyl; Rüdiger Rupp
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 3.169

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.