Anna M Bardone-Cone1, Kamila M Cass. 1. Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211, USA. bardoneconea@missouri.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study experimentally examined the effects of viewing a pro-anorexia website. METHOD: Following construction of a prototypic pro-anorexia website, 235 female undergraduates were randomly assigned to view either the pro-anorexia website or one of two comparison websites related to female fashion (using average-sized models) or home décor. Post-website affect, cognitions, and behavioral expectations were examined along with moderator effects. RESULTS: Study participants exposed to the pro-anorexia website had greater negative affect, lower social self-esteem, and lower appearance self-efficacy post-website than those who viewed a comparison website. Additionally, they perceived themselves as heavier, reported a greater likelihood of exercising and thinking about their weight in the near future, and engaged in more image comparison. Minimal support was found for moderator effects. CONCLUSION: Results provide an empirical basis for concern (expressed by clinicians, researchers, the media) that pro-anorexia websites are a troubling new form of thin-ideal exposure that warrants further examination. (c) 2007 by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: This study experimentally examined the effects of viewing a pro-anorexia website. METHOD: Following construction of a prototypic pro-anorexia website, 235 female undergraduates were randomly assigned to view either the pro-anorexia website or one of two comparison websites related to female fashion (using average-sized models) or home décor. Post-website affect, cognitions, and behavioral expectations were examined along with moderator effects. RESULTS: Study participants exposed to the pro-anorexia website had greater negative affect, lower social self-esteem, and lower appearance self-efficacy post-website than those who viewed a comparison website. Additionally, they perceived themselves as heavier, reported a greater likelihood of exercising and thinking about their weight in the near future, and engaged in more image comparison. Minimal support was found for moderator effects. CONCLUSION: Results provide an empirical basis for concern (expressed by clinicians, researchers, the media) that pro-anorexia websites are a troubling new form of thin-ideal exposure that warrants further examination. (c) 2007 by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Authors: Martin Teufel; Eva Hofer; Florian Junne; Helene Sauer; Stephan Zipfel; Katrin Elisabeth Giel Journal: Eat Weight Disord Date: 2013-07-27 Impact factor: 4.652
Authors: Stefan Rennick-Egglestone; Kate Morgan; Joy Llewellyn-Beardsley; Amy Ramsay; Rose McGranahan; Steve Gillard; Ada Hui; Fiona Ng; Justine Schneider; Susie Booth; Vanessa Pinfold; Larry Davidson; Donna Franklin; Simon Bradstreet; Simone Arbour; Mike Slade Journal: Can J Psychiatry Date: 2019-05-02 Impact factor: 4.356
Authors: Kristina Saffran; Ellen E Fitzsimmons-Craft; Andrea E Kass; Denise E Wilfley; Craig Barr Taylor; Mickey Trockel Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2016-06-15 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Shaina J Sowles; Monique McLeary; Allison Optican; Elizabeth Cahn; Melissa J Krauss; Ellen E Fitzsimmons-Craft; Denise E Wilfley; Patricia A Cavazos-Rehg Journal: Body Image Date: 2018-02-03