Literature DB >> 17525859

Colorectal carcinoma: a retrospective, descriptive study of age, gender, subsite, stage, and differentiation in Iran from 1995 to 2001 as observed in Tehran University.

Mohhamad S Fazeli1, Maryam Ghavami Adel, Amir H Lebaschi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Colorectal carcinoma is one of the most common cancers in the world as well as in Iran. There are differences in subsite of the carcinoma when considering age and gender. This study was designed to describe the distribution of colorectal carcinoma by age at diagnosis, gender, and subsite of the tumor. These factors also are evaluated in conjunction with disease stage and tumor differentiation at the time of diagnosis.
METHODS: Data from 419 patients from a population that receives no screening between April 1995 and March 2001 operated on in the Cancer Institute and Imam Khomieni Hospital with a diagnosis of colorectal cancer were used to describe distribution of the colorectal carcinoma by age, gender, tumor subsite and pathology, and stage at diagnosis.
RESULTS: There were 403 (96.2 percent) cases of adenocarcinoma. Males and females constituted 52.4 and 47.6 percent of cases, respectively. The mean age was 52.3 years. Patients were divided into two age groups (40 years and younger, and older than 40 years); 16.4 percent of patients had tumors in the proximal colon and 83.6 percent in distal parts. Most patients were Stage II and III (48.1 and 33.4 percent, respectively). Tumor subsite distribution was almost the same between the two age groups (aged 40 years and younger: proximal, 18.5 percent, and distal, 81.5 percent; older than aged 40 years: proximal, 15.7 percent, and distal, 84.3 percent). Most patients in the younger age group were Stage III (45 percent) and in the older age group were Stage II (53.2 percent; P<0.001). Tumor differentiation proportions in patients aged 40 years and younger were: good, 24.4 percent; moderate, 53.6 percent; poor, 22 percent; and in patients older than aged 40 years were: good, 41.5 percent; moderate, 52.6 percent; poor, 5.9 percent (P<0.001). There were no differences in stage and tumor differentiation between two genders, but most of the patients with tumors in proximal colon were males (62.5 percent; P=0.1).
CONCLUSIONS: Most of the colorectal carcinomas were in distal parts in our study, so most of these carcinomas can be detected by proctosigmoidoscopy. Because younger patients had more advanced disease, the importance of screening and "clinical suspicion" in the young is important.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17525859     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-007-0248-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  21 in total

1.  The impact of age on outcome after surgery for colorectal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  A L Widdison; S Wienand Barnett; N Betambeau
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Colorectal cancer distribution in 220 Indian patients undergoing colonoscopy.

Authors:  Musthafa Chalikandy Peedikayil; Prem Nair; S M Seena; Lakshmi Radhakrishnan; Shine Sadasivan; V A Naryanan; V Balakrishnan
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-04-28

3.  High frequency of genes' promoter methylation, but lack of BRAF V600E mutation among Iranian colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Fakhraddin Naghibalhossaini; Hamideh Mahmoodzadeh Hosseini; Pooneh Mokarram; Mozhdeh Zamani
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 4.  Immunohistochemical study of MUC1, MUC2 and MUC5AC in colorectal carcinoma and review of literature.

Authors:  Mrunal V Kesari; Vandana L Gaopande; Avinash R Joshi; Shreedhar V Babanagare; Bageshree P Gogate; Ameya V Khadilkar
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-04

5.  Changes on the disease pattern of primary colorectal cancers in Southern China: a retrospective study of 20 years.

Authors:  Shenghong Zhang; Yi Cui; Zijin Weng; Xiaorong Gong; Minhu Chen; Bihui Zhong
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Clinical predictors of colorectal polyps and carcinoma in a low prevalence region: results of a colonoscopy based study.

Authors:  Yousef Bafandeh; Manoochehr Khoshbaten; Amir-Taher Eftekhar Sadat; Sara Farhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Colorectal carcinoma in Lagos and Sagamu, Southwest Nigeria: a histopathological review.

Authors:  Fatimah-Biade Abdulkareem; Emmanuel-Kunle Abudu; Nicholas-Awodele Awolola; Stephen-Olafimihan Elesha; Olorunda Rotimi; Olakanmi-Raphael Akinde; Ayoola-Oluwole Atoyebi; Adedoyin-Adekunle Adesanya; Adetola-Olubunmi Daramola; Adekumbiola-Aina-Fehintola Banjo; Charles-Chidozie Anunobi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Young colorectal carcinoma patients do not have a poorer prognosis: a comparative review of 2,426 cases.

Authors:  S A Yeo; M H Chew; P K Koh; C L Tang
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.781

9.  Clinicopathological patterns and challenges of management of colorectal cancer in a resource-limited setting: a Tanzanian experience.

Authors:  Phillipo L Chalya; Mabula D McHembe; Joseph B Mabula; Peter F Rambau; Hyasinta Jaka; Mheta Koy; Eliasa Mkongo; Nestory Masalu
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  Impact of BRAF, MLH1 on the incidence of microsatellite instability high colorectal cancer in populations based study.

Authors:  Hassan Brim; Pooneh Mokarram; Fakhraddin Naghibalhossaini; Mehdi Saberi-Firoozi; Mansour Al-Mandhari; Kamla Al-Mawaly; Rayhaneh Al-Mjeni; Abeer Al-Sayegh; Sandy Raeburn; Edward Lee; Francis Giardiello; Duane T Smoot; Alexander Vilkin; C Richard Boland; Ajay Goel; Mitra Hafezi; Mehdi Nouraie; Hassan Ashktorab
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 27.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.