INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant docetaxel/gemcitabine treatment in a biweekly regimen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with stage II/III breast cancer were treated with docetaxel (65 mg/m(2)) followed by gemcitabine (2500 mg/m(2)) every 2 weeks for 6 cycles. Patients with a clinical response or stable disease underwent mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery plus axillary dissection. After surgery, patients received 4 cycles of standard doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) every 21 days. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were included in the trial. The overall response rate was 71.4% (95% CI: 53.7-85.4), with 8 complete and 17 partial responses. Breast conservation was possible in 59% of the patients. Toxicity was manageable. CONCLUSIONS: We consider biweekly docetaxel and gemcitabine could be an active and tolerable regimen option in the neoadjuvant setting sequentially with standard adjuvant doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide in patients with stage II or III breast cancer.
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant docetaxel/gemcitabine treatment in a biweekly regimen. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Patients with stage II/III breast cancer were treated with docetaxel (65 mg/m(2)) followed by gemcitabine (2500 mg/m(2)) every 2 weeks for 6 cycles. Patients with a clinical response or stable disease underwent mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery plus axillary dissection. After surgery, patients received 4 cycles of standard doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) every 21 days. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were included in the trial. The overall response rate was 71.4% (95% CI: 53.7-85.4), with 8 complete and 17 partial responses. Breast conservation was possible in 59% of the patients. Toxicity was manageable. CONCLUSIONS: We consider biweekly docetaxel and gemcitabine could be an active and tolerable regimen option in the neoadjuvant setting sequentially with standard adjuvant doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide in patients with stage II or III breast cancer.
Authors: S Palmeri; M Vaglica; S Spada; G Filippelli; A Farris; L Palmeri; B Massidda; A Misino; F Ferraù; G Comella; V Leonardi; G Condemi; A Mangiameli; G De Cataldis; M C Macaluso; M Cajozzo; E Iannitto; M Danova Journal: Oncology Date: 2005-07-14 Impact factor: 2.935
Authors: L R Laufman; C H Spiridonidis; J Pritchard; R Roach; J Zangmeister; N Larrimer; T Moore; M Segal; J Jones; T Patel; L Gutterman; L Carman; D Colborn; J P Kuebler Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: S Chan; K Friedrichs; D Noel; T Pintér; S Van Belle; D Vorobiof; R Duarte; M Gil Gil; I Bodrogi; E Murray; L Yelle; G von Minckwitz; S Korec; P Simmonds; F Buzzi; R González Mancha; G Richardson; E Walpole; M Ronzoni; M Murawsky; M Alakl; A Riva; J Crown Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1999-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: G Pérez-Manga; A Lluch; E Alba; J A Moreno-Nogueira; M Palomero; J García-Conde; D Khayat; N Rivelles Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: G Bonadonna; P Valagussa; C Brambilla; L Ferrari; A Moliterni; M Terenziani; M Zambetti Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1998-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Harry D Bear; Stewart Anderson; Roy E Smith; Charles E Geyer; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Bernard Fisher; Ann M Brown; Andre Robidoux; Richard Margolese; Morton S Kahlenberg; Soonmyung Paik; Atilla Soran; D Lawrence Wickerham; Norman Wolmark Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-04-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Eva Thomas; Frankie A Holmes; Terry L Smith; Aman U Buzdar; Debra K Frye; Giuseppe Fraschini; S Eva Singletary; Richard L Theriault; Marsha D McNeese; Frederick Ames; Ronald Walters; Gabriel N Hortobagyi Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-06-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ye Won Jeon; Tae Hyun Kim; Hyun Jo Youn; Sehwan Han; Yongsik Jung; Geumhee Gwak; Young Sam Park; Jeong Soo Kim; Young Jin Suh Journal: J Breast Cancer Date: 2017-12-19 Impact factor: 3.588