Literature DB >> 15197190

The use of alternate, non-cross-resistant adjuvant chemotherapy on the basis of pathologic response to a neoadjuvant doxorubicin-based regimen in women with operable breast cancer: long-term results from a prospective randomized trial.

Eva Thomas1, Frankie A Holmes, Terry L Smith, Aman U Buzdar, Debra K Frye, Giuseppe Fraschini, S Eva Singletary, Richard L Theriault, Marsha D McNeese, Frederick Ames, Ronald Walters, Gabriel N Hortobagyi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of an alternate, non-cross-resistant adjuvant chemotherapy regimen in women with a poor pathologic response to a preoperative doxorubicin-based regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with locally advanced breast cancer received three cycles of vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone (VACP) every 21 days followed by surgery. Patients with less than 1 cm(3) residual tumor at mastectomy received an additional five cycles of VACP. Those with more than 1 cm(3) residual tumor were randomly assigned to receive an additional five cycles of VACP or five cycles of vinblastine, methotrexate with calcium leucovorin rescue, and fluorouracil (VbMF).
RESULTS: One hundred ninety-three patients were evaluable. Overall clinical response was seen in 83.4% after three cycles of VACP, whereas the pathologic complete response was 12.2%. One hundred six patients were randomly assigned to VACP or VbMF. Those receiving VbMF achieved higher relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) than those who received additional VACP, although the differences did not reach statistical significance. Initial stage of tumor, clinical complete response, and pathologic complete response were all associated with statistically superior survival rates.
CONCLUSION: Clinical and pathologic response to preoperative doxorubicin-based chemotherapy predicted for improved survival in women with operable breast cancer. For those with a poor response to initial neoadjuvant chemotherapy, treatment with VbMF was associated with a trend toward improved RFS and OS compared with those continuing with the doxorubicin regimen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15197190     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.05.207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  30 in total

Review 1.  Neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer: assessing treatment progress and managing poor responders.

Authors:  Robert Wesolowski; Georg Thomas Budd
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Image Registration for Microwave Tomography of the Breast Using Priors From Nonsimultaneous Previous Magnetic Resonance Images.

Authors:  Gregory Boverman; Cynthia E L Davis; Shireen D Geimer; Paul M Meaney
Journal:  IEEE J Electromagn RF Microw Med Biol       Date:  2017-12-27

Review 3.  Adding Adjuvant Systemic Treatment after Neoadjuvant Therapy in Breast Cancer: Review of the Data.

Authors:  Shetal A Patel; Angela DeMichele
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  A Canadian national expert consensus on neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer: linking practice to evidence and beyond.

Authors:  C E Simmons; S Hogeveen; R Leonard; Y Rajmohan; D Han; A Wong; J Lee; M Brackstone; J F Boileau; R Dinniwell; S Gandhi
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced breast cancer: Focus on chemotherapy and biological targeted treatments' armamentarium.

Authors:  Konstantinos Papadimitriou; Konstantinos Papademetriou; Alexandros Ardavanis; Panteleimon Kountourakis
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Increased efficacy of a dose-dense regimen of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast carcinoma: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Bohuslav Melichar; Helena Hornychová; Hana Kalábová; Hana Bašová; Jindřiška Mergancová; Hana Urminská; Pavel Jandík; Vladimír Cervinka; Jan Laco; Aleš Ryška
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 7.  Breast cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and residual disease.

Authors:  Mariana Chávez-MacGregor; Ana María González-Angulo
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.405

8.  Inflammatory breast cancer-comparing the effectivity of preoperative docetaxel-epirubicine protocol to conventional antracycline-containing chemotherapy to achieve clinical benefit and complete pathological response.

Authors:  Zsolt Horváth; László Torday; Erika Hitre; Erna Ganofszky; Eva Juhos; Ferenc Czeglédi; László Urbán; Csaba Polgár; István Láng; Sándor Eckhardt; Miklós Kásler
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 3.201

9.  Predictive significance of the proportion of ER-positive or PgR-positive tumor cells in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable HER2-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Tomofumi Osako; Reiki Nishimura; Yasuhiro Okumura; Yasuo Toyozumi; Nobuyuki Arima
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 2.447

10.  State of the art of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: rationale, results and recent developments.

Authors:  Arnd Honig; Lorenz Rieger; Marc Sutterlin; Diethelm Wallwiener; Johannes Dietl; Erich-Franz Solomayer
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2005-09-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.