Literature DB >> 17524849

Does donor nephron mass have any impact on graft survival?

M Taherimahmoudi1, A Mehrsai, M Nikoobakht, A Saraji, A Emamzadeh, G Pourmand.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Functioning nephron mass namely, the number of nephrons in the grafted kidney, is one of the nonimmunologic factors that may have some impact on long-term graft survival. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of donor nephron mass on graft outcome in the recipient.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1989 to 2005, 1000 renal transplants were performed at our center. The 217 studied cases were followed for an average of 8 years. All patients received grafts from living donors. The weight of the grafted kidney (donor nephron mass) as well as the recipient's body mass index (BMI) were measured at the time of operation. Nephron mass index (NMI) was defined as the ratio of donor nephron mass to recipient BMI. Associations between variables were tested by logistic regression and Pearson correlation using the SAS system and S-plus statistical software. To evaluate graft function, we determined serum creatinine values, acute rejection episodes and chronic nephropathy.
RESULTS: Mean NMI was 8.07 +/- 0.2 and mean creatinine level was 1.43 +/- 0.4 mg/dL. There were 32 cases (14.7%) of acute rejection, who were managed successfully with antithymocyte globulin (ATG) in 28 cases. Four patients lost their grafts. There were 15 cases (7%) of graft loss due to chronic rejection. Using Pearson correlation, we observed no association between NMI and mean serum creatinine level. Logistic regression showed a significant relation between NMI and acute rejection (P<.05) with an odds ratio of 2.0. There was no significant correlation between NMI and chronic rejection.
CONCLUSIONS: The lower the NMI, the greater the short-term graft loss. However, in the long term, no significant correlation was found between graft survival and NMI. Also, mean creatinine level was not significantly different among patients regardless of NMI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17524849     DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.03.084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Proc        ISSN: 0041-1345            Impact factor:   1.066


  4 in total

1.  CT-based renal volume and graft function after living-donor kidney transplantation: Is there a volume threshold to avoid?

Authors:  Jorge Dias; Jorge Malheiro; Manuela Almeida; Leonídio Dias; Miguel Silva-Ramos; La Salete Martins; Luís Xambre; António Castro-Henriques
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  The impact of donor and recipient weight incompatibility on renal transplant outcomes.

Authors:  Limy Wong; Aileen Counihan; Patrick O'Kelly; Donal J Sexton; Conall M O'Seaghdha; Colm Magee; Dilly Little; Peter J Conlon
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Success of kidney transplantations from deceased donors with acute kidney injury.

Authors:  Jana Bauer; Sascha Grzella; Malwina Bialobrzecka; Lea Berger; Timm H Westhoff; Richard Viebahn; Peter Schenker
Journal:  Ann Transplant       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 1.530

4.  Is Bigger Better? Living Donor Kidney Volume as Measured by the Donor CT Angiogram in Predicting Donor and Recipient eGFR after Living Donor Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  Chaudhry Adeel Ebad; David Brennan; Julio Chevarria; Mohammad Bin Hussein; Donal Sexton; Douglas Mulholland; Ciaran Doyle; Patrick O'Kelly; Yvonne Williams; Ruth Dunne; Conall O'Seaghdha; Dilly Little; Martina Morrin; Peter J Conlon
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2021-07-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.