Literature DB >> 17523508

Buttonholes during LASIK: etiology and outcome.

Henia Lichter1, R Doyle Stulting, George O Waring, Gregg E Russell, Jonathan Carr.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report the clinical features and outcome of eyes with flap buttonhole during LASIK.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed to identify eyes that developed flap buttonhole during Hansatome microkeratome translation. Pre-, intra-, and postoperative data were obtained to identify factors predictive of buttonhole.
RESULTS: Five patients with buttonhole were identified from June 2001 through September 2002 (5 [0.06%] eyes of 7672 primary LASIK procedures). Mean patient age was 49.2 +/- 11.3 years (range: 37 to 66 years). Mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was 4.92 +/- 2.90 diopters (D) (range: -2.25 to -9.50 D). Mean keratometry was 45.59 +/- 1.15 D (range: 43.90 to 47.60 D). All 5 flap buttonholes occurred in the second of 2 consecutively treated eyes (P = .03). Buttonhole occurred in 2 (0.26%) of 778 eyes where the 160-microm microkeratome plate was used, and 3 (0.06%) of 4350 eyes where the 180-microm plate was used (P = .16). Two eyes received laser ablation at the time of buttonhole formation. In the untreated cases, the buttonhole flap itself caused a myopic spherical change of -0.50 D and 0.70 D of astigmatism. One of 5 eyes lost 2 lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity; this eye received laser ablation immediately after buttonhole formation.
CONCLUSIONS: Buttonholes are significantly more likely to occur in the second of two consecutively treated eyes. A new blade for the second eye when the flap in the first eye appears to be thin should be considered. Caution should be exercised when considering laser ablation immediately following buttonhole formation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17523508     DOI: 10.3928/1081-597X-20070501-09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  5 in total

1.  Corneal flap morphological analysis using anterior segment optical coherence tomography in laser in situ keratomileusis with femtosecond lasers versus mechanical microkeratome.

Authors:  Xiao-Xiao Zhang; Xing-Wu Zhong; Jun-Shu Wu; Zheng Wang; Ke-Ming Yu; Quan Liu; Bin Yang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Intraoperative flap complications in laser in situ keratomileusis with two types of microkeratomes.

Authors:  Hani S Al-Mezaine; Saleh A Al-Amro; Saleh Al-Obeidan
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-04-23

Review 3.  Femtosecond laser in laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Marcella Q Salomão; Steven E Wilson
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Analysis of corneal endothelial cell density and morphology after laser in situ keratomileusis using two types of femtosecond lasers.

Authors:  Minoru Tomita; George O Waring; Miyuki Watabe
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-09-24

5.  Comparison of DLK incidence after laser in situ keratomileusis associated with two femtosecond lasers: Femto LDV and IntraLase FS60.

Authors:  Minoru Tomita; Yuko Sotoyama; Satoshi Yukawa; Tadayuki Nakamura
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-07-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.