PURPOSE: To prospectively assess sensitivity and specificity of diffusion indexes of the corpus callosum (CC) for differentiating relapsing neuromyelitis optica (RNMO) from relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), by using final clinical diagnosis as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants provided informed consent; the study was approved by the institutional review board. Forty-six consecutive patients with RRMS (18 men, 28 women; mean age, 37.7 years; range, 18-58 years) and 26 consecutive patients with RNMO (two men, 24 women; mean age, 38.6 years; range, 19-59 years) underwent diffusion-tensor magnetic resonance imaging. Mean diffusivity (MD) and fractional anisotropy (FA) of the region of interest (ROI) of the CC in the midsagittal plane were measured and used as discriminative indexes. Bayesian classification with leave-one-out cross-validation was used to determine diagnostic accuracy. Differences in diffusion indexes of ROIs among groups were evaluated by using the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by the Mann-Whitney U test for multiple comparisons and Bonferroni correction. RESULTS: Mean MD (8.48 x 10(-4) mm(2)/sec) and FA (0.729) of the ROI in patients with RNMO were significantly (P<.001) different from those (MD=10.64 x 10(-4) mm(2)/sec, FA=0.599) in patients with RRMS. Sensitivity and specificity for differentiation were 92.3% (24 of 26 patients with RNMO) and 93.5% (43 of 46 patients with RRMS) for FA and 88.5% (23 of 26 patients with RNMO) and 89.1% (41 of 46 patients with RRMS) for MD, respectively. CONCLUSION: Measurement of diffusion indexes of the CC may be useful for distinguishing patients with RNMO from those with RRMS. (c) RSNA, 2007.
PURPOSE: To prospectively assess sensitivity and specificity of diffusion indexes of the corpus callosum (CC) for differentiating relapsing neuromyelitis optica (RNMO) from relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), by using final clinical diagnosis as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Participants provided informed consent; the study was approved by the institutional review board. Forty-six consecutive patients with RRMS (18 men, 28 women; mean age, 37.7 years; range, 18-58 years) and 26 consecutive patients with RNMO (two men, 24 women; mean age, 38.6 years; range, 19-59 years) underwent diffusion-tensor magnetic resonance imaging. Mean diffusivity (MD) and fractional anisotropy (FA) of the region of interest (ROI) of the CC in the midsagittal plane were measured and used as discriminative indexes. Bayesian classification with leave-one-out cross-validation was used to determine diagnostic accuracy. Differences in diffusion indexes of ROIs among groups were evaluated by using the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by the Mann-Whitney U test for multiple comparisons and Bonferroni correction. RESULTS: Mean MD (8.48 x 10(-4) mm(2)/sec) and FA (0.729) of the ROI in patients with RNMO were significantly (P<.001) different from those (MD=10.64 x 10(-4) mm(2)/sec, FA=0.599) in patients with RRMS. Sensitivity and specificity for differentiation were 92.3% (24 of 26 patients with RNMO) and 93.5% (43 of 46 patients with RRMS) for FA and 88.5% (23 of 26 patients with RNMO) and 89.1% (41 of 46 patients with RRMS) for MD, respectively. CONCLUSION: Measurement of diffusion indexes of the CC may be useful for distinguishing patients with RNMO from those with RRMS. (c) RSNA, 2007.
Authors: Wim Van Hecke; Alexander Leemans; Steve De Backer; Ben Jeurissen; Paul M Parizel; Jan Sijbers Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: F Pache; H Zimmermann; C Finke; A Lacheta; S Papazoglou; J Kuchling; J Wuerfel; B Hamm; K Ruprecht; F Paul; A U Brandt; M Scheel Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-03-24 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Lawrence G Miller; Jennifer A Young; Swapan K Ray; Guanghu Wang; Sharad Purohit; Naren L Banik; Somsankar Dasgupta Journal: Neurochem Res Date: 2017-05-05 Impact factor: 3.996