F Pache1,2, H Zimmermann3, C Finke4,5, A Lacheta3, S Papazoglou3, J Kuchling3, J Wuerfel3, B Hamm6, K Ruprecht4, F Paul3,4, A U Brandt3, M Scheel3,6. 1. NeuroCure Clinical Research Center and Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. florence.pache@charite.de. 2. Department of Neurology, Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. florence.pache@charite.de. 3. NeuroCure Clinical Research Center and Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. 4. Department of Neurology, Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. 5. Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany. 6. Department of Radiology, Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate different brain regions for grey (GM) and white matter (WM) damage in a well-defined cohort of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) patients and compare advanced MRI techniques (VBM, Subcortical and cortical analyses (Freesurfer), and DTI) for their ability to detect damage in NMOSD. METHODS: We analyzed 21 NMOSD patients and 21 age and gender matched control subjects. VBM (GW/WM) and DTI whole brain (TBSS) analyses were performed at different statistical thresholds to reflect different statistical approaches in previous studies. In an automated atlas-based approach, Freesurfer and DTI results were compared between NMOSD and controls. RESULTS: DTI TBSS and DTI atlas based analysis demonstrated microstructural impairment only within the optic radiation or in regions associated with the optic radiation (posterior thalamic radiation p < 0.001, 6.9 % reduction of fractional anisotropy). VBM demonstrated widespread brain GM and WM reduction, but only at exploratory statistical thresholds, with no differences remaining after correction for multiple comparisons. Freesurfer analysis demonstrated no group differences. CONCLUSION: NMOSD specific parenchymal brain damage is predominantly located in the optic radiation, likely due to a secondary degeneration caused by ON. In comparison, DTI appears to be the most reliable and sensitive technique for brain damage detection in NMOSD. KEY POINTS: • The hypothesis of a widespread brain damage in NMOSD is challenged. • The optic radiation (OR) is the most severely affected region. • OR-affection is likely due to secondary degeneration following optic neuritis. • DTI is currently the most sensitive technique for NMOSD-related brain-damage detection. • DTI is currently the most reliable technique for NMOSD-related brain-damage detection.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate different brain regions for grey (GM) and white matter (WM) damage in a well-defined cohort of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) patients and compare advanced MRI techniques (VBM, Subcortical and cortical analyses (Freesurfer), and DTI) for their ability to detect damage in NMOSD. METHODS: We analyzed 21 NMOSD patients and 21 age and gender matched control subjects. VBM (GW/WM) and DTI whole brain (TBSS) analyses were performed at different statistical thresholds to reflect different statistical approaches in previous studies. In an automated atlas-based approach, Freesurfer and DTI results were compared between NMOSD and controls. RESULTS: DTI TBSS and DTI atlas based analysis demonstrated microstructural impairment only within the optic radiation or in regions associated with the optic radiation (posterior thalamic radiation p < 0.001, 6.9 % reduction of fractional anisotropy). VBM demonstrated widespread brain GM and WM reduction, but only at exploratory statistical thresholds, with no differences remaining after correction for multiple comparisons. Freesurfer analysis demonstrated no group differences. CONCLUSION: NMOSD specific parenchymal brain damage is predominantly located in the optic radiation, likely due to a secondary degeneration caused by ON. In comparison, DTI appears to be the most reliable and sensitive technique for brain damage detection in NMOSD. KEY POINTS: • The hypothesis of a widespread brain damage in NMOSD is challenged. • The optic radiation (OR) is the most severely affected region. • OR-affection is likely due to secondary degeneration following optic neuritis. • DTI is currently the most sensitive technique for NMOSD-related brain-damage detection. • DTI is currently the most reliable technique for NMOSD-related brain-damage detection.
Authors: Fernanda C Rueda Lopes; Thomas Doring; Christianne Martins; Fernanda C Cabral; Fabíola R Malfetano; Valéria C S R Pereira; Soniza Alves-Leon; Emerson L Gasparetto Journal: Radiology Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Mark Jenkinson; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Mark W Woolrich; Stephen M Smith Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2011-09-16 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Caspar F Pfueller; Alexander U Brandt; Florian Schubert; Markus Bock; Bernadeta Walaszek; Helmar Waiczies; Thomas Schwenteck; Jan Dörr; Judith Bellmann-Strobl; Christian Mohr; Nicholetta Weinges-Evers; Bernd Ittermann; Jens T Wuerfel; Friedemann Paul Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-04-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Dean M Wingerchuk; Brenda Banwell; Jeffrey L Bennett; Philippe Cabre; William Carroll; Tanuja Chitnis; Jérôme de Seze; Kazuo Fujihara; Benjamin Greenberg; Anu Jacob; Sven Jarius; Marco Lana-Peixoto; Michael Levy; Jack H Simon; Silvia Tenembaum; Anthony L Traboulsee; Patrick Waters; Kay E Wellik; Brian G Weinshenker Journal: Neurology Date: 2015-06-19 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Imke Metz; Tim Beißbarth; David Ellenberger; Florence Pache; Lidia Stork; Marius Ringelstein; Orhan Aktas; Sven Jarius; Brigitte Wildemann; Hassan Dihazi; Tim Friede; Wolfgang Brück; Klemens Ruprecht; Friedemann Paul Journal: Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm Date: 2016-02-02
Authors: Laura Clarke; Simon Arnett; Kate Lilley; Jacky Liao; Sandeep Bhuta; Simon A Broadley Journal: Clin Exp Immunol Date: 2021-07-06 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Scott C Kolbe; Anneke van der Walt; Helmut Butzkueven; Alexander Klistorner; Gary F Egan; Trevor J Kilpatrick Journal: J Ophthalmol Date: 2016-07-31 Impact factor: 1.909
Authors: Frederike C Oertel; Joseph Kuchling; Hanna Zimmermann; Claudia Chien; Felix Schmidt; Benjamin Knier; Judith Bellmann-Strobl; Thomas Korn; Michael Scheel; Alexander Klistorner; Klemens Ruprecht; Friedemann Paul; Alexander U Brandt Journal: Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm Date: 2017-02-22