Literature DB >> 17520534

Impact of different methods of feedback to clinicians after postprescription antimicrobial review based on the Centers For Disease Control and Prevention's 12 Steps to Prevent Antimicrobial Resistance Among Hospitalized Adults.

Sara E Cosgrove1, Alpa Patel, Xiaoyan Song, Robert E Miller, Kathleen Speck, Amy Banowetz, Rachel Hadler, Ronda L Sinkowitz-Cochran, Denise M Cardo, Arjun Srinivasan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate (1) the framework of the 12 Steps to Prevent Antimicrobial Resistance Among Hospitalized Adults that is part of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Campaign to Prevent Antimicrobial Resistance in Healthcare Settings, with regard to steps addressing antimicrobial use; and (2) methods of feedback to clinicians regarding antimicrobial use after postprescription review.
DESIGN: Prospective intervention to identify and modify inappropriate antimicrobial therapy.
SETTING: A 1,000-bed, tertiary care teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Inpatients in selected medicine and surgery units receiving broad-spectrum antimicrobials for 48-72 hours.
INTERVENTIONS: We created a computer-based clinical-event detection system that automatically identified inpatients taking broad-spectrum and "reserve" antimicrobials for 48-72 hours. Although prior approval was required for initial administration of broad-spectrum and reserve antimicrobials, once approval was obtained, therapy with the antimicrobials could be continued indefinitely at the discretion of the treating clinician. Therapy that was ongoing at 48-72 hours was reviewed by an infectious diseases pharmacist or physician, and when indicated feedback was provided to clinicians to modify or discontinue therapy. Feedback was provided via a direct telephone call, a note on the front of the medical record, or text message sent to the clinician's pager. The acceptance rate of feedback was recorded and recommendations were categorized according to the 12 steps recommended by the CDC.
RESULTS: Interventions were recommended for 334 (30%) of 1,104 courses of antimicrobial therapy reviewed. A total of 87% of interventions fit into one of the CDC's 12 steps of prevention: 39% into step 3 ("target the pathogen"), 1% into step 4 ("access experts"), 3% into steps 7 and 8 ("treat infection, not colonization or contamination"), 18% into step 9 ("say ;no' to vancomycin"), and 26% into step 10 ("stop treatment when no infection"). The rate of compliance with recommendations to improve antimicrobial use was 72%. No differences in compliance were seen with the different methods of feedback.
CONCLUSIONS: Nearly one-third of antimicrobial courses did not follow the CDC's recommended 12 steps for prevention of antimicrobial resistance. Clinicians demonstrated high compliance with following suggestions made after postprescription review, suggesting that it is a useful approach to decreasing and improving antimicrobial use among inpatients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17520534     DOI: 10.1086/518345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol        ISSN: 0899-823X            Impact factor:   3.254


  18 in total

1.  Antimicrobial stewardship.

Authors:  Shira Doron; Lisa E Davidson
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Unsolicited post-prescription antibiotic review in surgical and medical wards: factors associated with counselling and physicians' compliance.

Authors:  P Lesprit; C Landelle; C Brun-Buisson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Strategies to enhance rational use of antibiotics in hospital: a guideline by the German Society for Infectious Diseases.

Authors:  K de With; F Allerberger; S Amann; P Apfalter; H-R Brodt; T Eckmanns; M Fellhauer; H K Geiss; O Janata; R Krause; S Lemmen; E Meyer; H Mittermayer; U Porsche; E Presterl; S Reuter; B Sinha; R Strauß; A Wechsler-Fördös; C Wenisch; W V Kern
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.553

4.  The antimicrobial stewardship program in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) states: insights from a regional survey.

Authors:  Mushira A Enani
Journal:  J Infect Prev       Date:  2015-10-08

5.  The effect of a whole-system approach in an antimicrobial stewardship programme at the Singapore General Hospital.

Authors:  J Teo; A L H Kwa; J Loh; M P Chlebicki; W Lee
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Antibiotic use in neonatal intensive care units and adherence with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 12 Step Campaign to Prevent Antimicrobial Resistance.

Authors:  Sameer J Patel; Adebayo Oshodi; Priya Prasad; Patricia Delamora; Elaine Larson; Theoklis Zaoutis; David A Paul; Lisa Saiman
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Reducing Antimicrobial Use in an Academic Pediatric Institution: Evaluation of the Effectiveness of a Prospective Audit With Real-Time Feedback.

Authors:  Zachary I Willis; Jessica Gillon; Meng Xu; James C Slaughter; M Cecilia Di Pentima
Journal:  J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 3.164

8.  Antimicrobial stewardship: attempting to preserve a strategic resource.

Authors:  Trevor Van Schooneveld
Journal:  J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect       Date:  2011-07-18

9.  Outcome measurement of extensive implementation of antimicrobial stewardship in patients receiving intravenous antibiotics in a Japanese university hospital.

Authors:  T Niwa; Y Shinoda; A Suzuki; T Ohmori; M Yasuda; H Ohta; A Fukao; K Kitaichi; K Matsuura; T Sugiyama; N Murakami; Y Itoh
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Causes, consequences, and perspectives in the variations of intestinal density of colonization of multidrug-resistant enterobacteria.

Authors:  Etienne Ruppé; Antoine Andremont
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.