Literature DB >> 17520435

Endovascular coiling of intracranial aneurysms using bioactive coils: a single-center study.

S Rossitti1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Some degree of recanalization is reported in up to one-third of intracranial aneurysms treated with endovascular coiling. A technical development potentially effective in avoiding recanalization is the Matrix Detachable Coil (MDC), which is covered with a biodegradable polymeric material that enhances intra-aneurysmal clot organization and fibrosis.
PURPOSE: To report the initial clinical experience of MDC for endovascular aneurysm coiling in a single-center, single-operator, and well-defined population setting.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: 118 aneurysms in 104 patients (73 with subarachnoid hemorrhage, SAH) were embolized with MDC alone (n = 52) or combined with bare platinum coils (n = 66).
RESULTS: Initial aneurysm obliteration was class 1 (complete obliteration) in 45 aneurysms (38.1%), class 2 (residual neck) in 44 (37.3%), and class 3 (residual aneurysm) in 29 (24.6%). Procedure-related morbidity was 4.8%, and mortality 0.96%. Clinical follow-up of 61 patients with SAH (mean 5.9 months, range 1-17 months) showed good outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale, GOS 4-5) in 39 (63.9%), and poor outcome or death (GOS 1-3) in 22 (36.1%). Imaging follow-up of 73 aneurysms (average 6.5 months, range 1-17 months) showed class 1 in 47 (64.4%), class 2 in 18 (24.7%), and class 3 in eight (10.9%). Recanalization occurred in 11 aneurysms (15%), of which four (5.5%) required re-treatment.
CONCLUSION: This study confirms that aneurysm coiling with MDC is feasible, effective, and safe.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17520435     DOI: 10.1080/02841850701308360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  6 in total

Review 1.  Materials and techniques for coiling of cerebral aneurysms: how much scientific evidence do we have?

Authors:  W Kurre; J Berkefeld
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 2.  Stents for intracranial wide-necked aneurysms: more than mechanical protection.

Authors:  Isabel Wanke; Michael Forsting
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Comparative study of covered stent with coil embolization in the treatment of cranial internal carotid artery aneurysm: a nonrandomized prospective trial.

Authors:  Ming-Hua Li; Bing Leng; Yong-Dong Li; Hua-Qiao Tan; Wu Wang; Dong-Lei Song; Yan-Long Tian
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Coil Knotting during Endovascular Coil Embolization for Ruptured MCA Aneurysm. A Case Report.

Authors:  S C Kwon; I U Lyo; S H Shin; J B Park; Y Kim
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 1.610

5.  Long-term results with Matrix coils vs. GDC: an angiographic and histopathological comparison.

Authors:  C Roth; T Struffert; I Q Grunwald; B F M Romeike; C Krick; P Papanagiotou; P Krampe; W Reith
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Patient organ radiation doses during treatment for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  M Sandborg; J Nilsson Althén; H Pettersson; S Rossitti
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 3.649

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.