| Literature DB >> 17518998 |
Lucio Petrizzi1, Massimo Mariscoli, Luca Valbonetti, Vincenzo Varasano, Jens D Langhoff, Brigitte Von Rechenberg.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Several diseases affect bone healing and physiology. Many drugs that are commonly used in orthopaedics as "analgesics" or anti-inflammatory agents impair bone healing. Stressful conditions are associated with decreased serum osteocalcin concentration. High endorphin levels alter calcium metabolism, blocking the membrane channels by which calcium normally enters cells. The consequent decrease of intracellular calcium impairs the activities of calcium-related enzymes. Naloxone is a pure opioid antagonist. Morphine-induced osteocalcin inhibition was abolished when osteoblasts were incubated with naloxone. Naloxone restored the altered cellular and tissue physiology by removing beta-endorphins from specific receptors. However, this is only possible if the circulating Ca concentration is adequate. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of parenteral naloxone administration in inducing fast mineralization and callus remodelling in a group of sheep with a standardised bone lesion.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17518998 PMCID: PMC1891106 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-8-43
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.362
Figure 1Dorso-palmar radiograph of the metacarpus of one sheep (A5) after surgery (T1): selection of an area of 10500 pixels (70 × 150 h), indicated by the red dotted line, over the medial and lateral cortices, at the drill site (MCDS, LCDS) and on the adjacent normal bone (NMC, NLC), to be processed by graphic software (Corel Photo-Paint, CorelDraw) to obtain the histogram for each site. The LCDS/NLC and MCDS/NMC ratios were calculated to evaluate bone healing at different times.
Correspondence of the score (0–3) for the histological findings for each parameter considered during semiquantitative histopathological evaluation.
| Grade | Surrounding Cavities | Macrophages Mesenchymal Cells | Osteoblasts | Osteoclasts | Fibrous Tissue | Cartilage |
| 0 | None | None | None | None | None | None |
| 1 | Occupying less than 25% of the bone surrounding the drill hole | One or two cells per field of view within the drill hole | Less than 25% of the field of view within the drill hole occupied by cavities lined with osteoblasts | One or two osteoclasts per field of view within the drill hole | Less than 25% of the drill hole occupied by fibrous tissue | Less than 25% of the drill hole occupied by cartilage |
| 2 | Occupying up to 50% of the bone surrounding the drill hole | Up to five cells per field of view within the drill hole | Up to the 50 % of the field of view occupied by cavities lined with osteoblasts | Up to five osteoclasts per field of view within the drill hole | Up to 50% of the drill hole occupied by fibrous tissue | Up to 50% of the drill hole occupied by cartilage |
| 3 | Occupying more than 50% of the bone surrounding the drill hole | More than five cells per field of view within the drill hole | More than 50% of the field of view occupied by cavities lined with osteoblasts | More than five osteoclasts per field of view within the drill hole | More than 50% of the drill hole occupied by fibrous tissue | More than 50% of the drill hole occupied by cartilage |
The slides were examined with a light microscope (Leica DMR) at different magnifications (10×, 20× and 40×).
Radiographic histogram ratios: mean values at each time point in each treatment group.
| 1.00 | 0.88 | 0.89 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.94 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.95 | 0.94 | |
| 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.09 | |
| 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.91 | 0.92 | 0.90 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.94 | 0.93 | |
| 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.05 | |
| 1.00 | 0.91 | 0.94 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.97 | 0.96 | |
| 0.00 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.04 | |
| 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.96 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 1.03 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.99 | |
| 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.11 | 0.04 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.07 | |
Figure 2Radiographic histogram ratios: mean values at each time point in each treatment group.
Figure 3Comparison of a dorsopalmar radiography of the metacarpus of a sheep from Group A (control) and one of Group D (naloxone and calcium gluconate) at T6. The difference in radiodensity at the drill hole site is evident and is statistically significant.
Figure 4Semiquantitave histopathological evaluation of the samples obtained after eight weeks from surgery. (A) Microphotograph (10 ×; Toluidine Blue) of a slide obtained from a sheep of group A (Control); (B) Microphotograph (10 ×; Toluidine Blue) of a slide obtained from a sheep of group D (Naloxon and Calcium gluconate). Comparing the images is particularly evident the diffence in the number and area of the caverns surrounding the "drill hole" a. Parent bone; b. New bone; c. Fibrous tissue.
Semiquantitative evaluation scores of the samples obtained from each cortex of every animal.
| 0.70 | 0.50 | 2.00 | 1.20 | 1.20 | 0.40 | ||
| 0.82 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 0.42 | 0.63 | 0.70 | ||
| 0.00 | 0.20 | 2.00 | 1.00 | 1.70 | 0.60 | ||
| 0.00 | 0.42 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.67 | 0.52 | ||
| 0.63 | 0.38 | 1.38 | 0.75 | 1.63 | 0.88 | ||
| 0.92 | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.46 | 0.74 | 0.35 | ||
| 2.00 | 0.10 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.90 | 0.40 | ||
| 0.94 | 0.32 | 0.00 | 0.48 | 0.74 | 0.52 | ||
The parameters evaluated were number of remodelling cavities, presence of macrophages, number of osteoblasts and osteoclasts, quantity of fibrous tissue and presence of mesenchymal cells. Evaluation scores refer to 4 grades (0–3) of increasing quantity/number.