Literature DB >> 15233964

New model for simulation of fracture repair in full-grown beagle dogs: model characterization and results from a long-term study with ibandronate.

Frieder Bauss1, Robert K Schenk, Stefan Hört, Bernd Müller-Beckmann, Gisbert Sponer.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Given that bisphosphonates reduce bone turnover, it is important to establish that their long-term administration does not impair bone quality. This paper describes a new model for simulation of fracture repair to evaluate several aspects of bone quality following long-term administration (34 or 36 weeks) of ibandronate in full-grown beagle dogs.
METHODS: The treatment schedule consisted of continuous daily subcutaneous administration of a pharmacologically active dose (1 microg/kg/day) and two cyclical intermittent regimens providing a similar total dose per animal at the end of the experiment. Seven or 8 weeks before study end, 10 holes were drilled in the left tibia and bone marrow ablation was performed in the ipsilateral femur. Serial measurements for blood biochemistry (osteocalcin and iso-alkaline phosphatase) and bone mineral density (BMD; whole body and L1-L7) by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) were performed during the experiment. Bone quality was determined at the end of the experiment by assessing early and late stage defect healing and structural, cellular, and dynamic histomorphometry (femur, tibia, and lumbar vertebrae L3 and L4).
RESULTS: Healing of the drill hole defects, which simulate the first stage of fracture healing, was neither qualitatively nor quantitatively influenced by ibandronate. The same was true for the activation of cortical remodeling that occurs in the later stage of fracture healing, which started in Week 4 after surgery and declined after Week 8 in all groups. Additionally, no difference was found between the various regimens and the controls with respect to DEXA analyses, trabecular bone volume, cancellous bone tissue area, cancellous bone perimeter, osteoclast count, serum osteocalcin, or bone-specific alkaline phosphatase. DISCUSSION: In conclusion, the presence of the first and second steps of fracture healing and the fact that the histological features closely resemble those of fracture repair validate the development and characterization of a new model for simulation of fracture repair. A long-term study with a therapeutically active dose of ibandronate shows that ibandronate does not impair BMD, bone structure, bone repair, coupling, and serum parameters for bone formation and turnover after long-term administration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15233964     DOI: 10.1016/j.vascn.2003.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods        ISSN: 1056-8719            Impact factor:   1.950


  15 in total

Review 1.  Timing of the initiation of bisphosphonates after surgery for fracture healing: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Y-T Li; H-F Cai; Z-L Zhang
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Treating osteoporosis with bisphosphonates and addressing adherence: a review of oral ibandronate.

Authors:  Charles H Chesnut
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Use of bisphosphonates for the treatment of stress fractures in athletes.

Authors:  Yosuke Shima; Lars Engebretsen; Junji Iwasa; Katsuhiko Kitaoka; Katsuro Tomita
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  Ibandronate in osteoporosis: preclinical data and rationale for intermittent dosing.

Authors:  Frieder Bauss; R Graham G Russell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-03-26       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Mechanisms of action of bisphosphonates: similarities and differences and their potential influence on clinical efficacy.

Authors:  R G G Russell; N B Watts; F H Ebetino; M J Rogers
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Managing osteoporosis in patients with fragility fractures: did the British Orthopaedic Association guidelines have any impact?

Authors:  M F Nixon; T Ibrahim; Y Johari; S Eltayef; D Hariharan; G J Taylor
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 7.  Ibandronate treatment for osteoporosis: rationale, preclinical, and clinical development of extended dosing regimens.

Authors:  Solomon Epstein
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 8.  How do bisphosphonates affect fracture healing?

Authors:  Stephen L Kates; Cheryl L Ackert-Bicknell
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.586

9.  Preliminary study on the effect of parenteral naloxone, alone and in association with calcium gluconate, on bone healing in an ovine "drill hole" model system.

Authors:  Lucio Petrizzi; Massimo Mariscoli; Luca Valbonetti; Vincenzo Varasano; Jens D Langhoff; Brigitte Von Rechenberg
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Ibandronate: the first once-monthly oral bisphosphonate for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  Frieder Bauss; Ralph C Schimmer
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.