Literature DB >> 17518967

Effectiveness of ART and traditional amalgam approach in restoring single-surface cavities in posterior teeth of permanent dentitions in school children after 6.3 years.

J E Frencken1, M A van't Hof, D Taifour, I Al-Zaher.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) approach was compared with the traditional amalgam (TA) approach in order to test their appropriateness to complement a preventive and educational school oral health programme in Syria.
METHODS: Using a parallel group design, 370 and 311 grade 2 children were randomly assigned to the ART and the TA group respectively. Eight dentists placed 1117 single- and multiple-surface restorations. A modified actuarial method was used to estimate survival curves. The jackknife method was applied to calculate the standard error in the cumulative survival percentages.
RESULTS: A statistically significant difference in cumulative survival percentages between single-surface non-occlusal ART and comparable amalgam restorations was observed after 4.3, 5.3 and 6.3 years. The survival of single-surface non-occlusal ART posterior restorations (80.2 +/- 4.9%) was statistically significantly higher than that of occlusal posterior ART restorations (64.8 +/- 3.9%) at evaluation year 6.3. There was no statistically significant difference observed between survival percentages of large (55.8 +/- 10%) and that of small (69.2 +/- 4.6%) single-surface posterior ART restorations after 6.3 years. There was an operator effect observed for single-surface ART and comparable amalgam restorations. Secondary caries was observed in 2.3% of single-surface ART restorations and in 3.7% of single-surface amalgam restorations during the 6.3 year observation period.
CONCLUSIONS: The ART approach provided higher survival percentages for single-surface restorations than the TA approach over 6.3 years and is therefore appropriate for use in school oral health programmes. Secondary caries was only a minor reason for ART restorations to fail. An operator effect was observed for both treatment approaches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17518967     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2006.00322.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol        ISSN: 0301-5661            Impact factor:   3.383


  15 in total

1.  Atraumatic restorative treatment and Carisolv use for root caries in the elderly: 2-year follow-up randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  J A Gil-Montoya; R Mateos-Palacios; M Bravo; M A González-Moles; R Pulgar
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Atraumatic restorative treatment versus amalgam restoration longevity: a systematic review.

Authors:  Steffen Mickenautsch; Veerasamy Yengopal; Avijit Banerjee
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Survival percentages of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) restorations and sealants in posterior teeth: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  R G de Amorim; J E Frencken; D P Raggio; X Chen; X Hu; S C Leal
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Paediatric dentistry education of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) in Brazilian dental schools.

Authors:  L B Camargo; C Fell; G C Bonini; M Marquezan; J C P Imparato; F M Mendes; D P Raggio
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2011-12

5.  Success rates of manual restorative treatment (MRT) with amalgam in permanent teeth in high caries-risk Filipino children.

Authors:  I M Schüler; B Monse; C J Holmgren; T Lehmann; G S Itchon; R Heinrich-Weltzien
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 6.  Twenty-five-year atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach: a comprehensive overview.

Authors:  Jo E Frencken; Soraya Coelho Leal; Maria Fidela Navarro
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Absence of carious lesions at margins of glass-ionomer cement and amalgam restorations: An update of systematic review evidence.

Authors:  Steffen Mickenautsch; Veerasamy Yengopal
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2011-03-11

8.  Ten-year survival of ART restorations in permanent posterior teeth.

Authors:  Regia Luzia Zanata; Ticiane Cestari Fagundes; Maria Cristina Carvalho de Almendra Freitas; José Roberto Pereira Lauris; Maria Fidela de Lima Navarro
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Assessment of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) on the permanent dentition in a primary care setting in Nigeria.

Authors:  Olushola Ibiyemi; Olubunmi Olusola Bankole; Gbemisola Aderemi Oke
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.607

Review 10.  Atraumatic restorative treatment versus conventional restorative treatment for managing dental caries.

Authors:  Mojtaba Dorri; Maria José Martinez-Zapata; Tanya Walsh; Valeria Cc Marinho; Aubrey Sheiham Deceased; Carlos Zaror
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-12-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.