Literature DB >> 17518401

Robotic clinical trials of uni-condylar arthroplasty.

F Rodriguez1, S Harris, M Jakopec, A Barrett, P Gomes, J Henckel, J Cobb, B Davies.   

Abstract

A randomised clinical trial has been completed for uni-condylar arthroplasty. The trial, under the auspices of the UK MHRA, comprised 15 knees of patients undergoing conventional surgery, and 13 knees of patients who had robotic surgery using the Acrobot hands-on robotic system. The results of the trial were checked by comparing post-op CT scans with pre-op CT-based plans, and show a significant improvement in accuracy using the robot. The technical concept of the Acrobot approach is also described. Details of the complete system are outlined, including the pre-operative planner. The plan incorporates 3D CT models of the leg, together with CAD models of prostheses that can be used to plan the leg alignment, position the prostheses, plan the shape of the cuts required and generate the regions within which cuts must be constrained. The robotic system is also described, together with the methods for locating, clamping, cutting and monitoring the patient. An outline is given of the means by which the preoperative model is registered or aligned to the intra-operative position of the patient and of the robot, without the need for fiducial markers. Results of the randomised clinical trial are also discussed. Copyright 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 17518401     DOI: 10.1002/rcs.52

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Robot        ISSN: 1478-5951            Impact factor:   2.547


  7 in total

1.  Robot-assisted vs. conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty : Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jun Fu; Yuning Wang; Xiang Li; Baozhan Yu; Ming Ni; Wei Chai; Libo Hao; Jiying Chen
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  Robotic-assisted surgery in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: does it improve the precision of the surgery and its clinical outcomes? Systematic review.

Authors:  Roberto Negrín; Gonzalo Ferrer; Magaly Iñiguez; Jaime Duboy; Manuel Saavedra; Nicolas Reyes Larraín; Nicolas Jabes; Maximiliano Barahona
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2020-10-27

3.  Robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty: an evolution in progress. A concise review of the available systems and the data supporting them.

Authors:  Johanna Elliott; Jobe Shatrov; Brett Fritsch; David Parker
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Implant orientation accuracy of a hand-held robotic partial knee replacement system over conventional technique in a cadaveric test.

Authors:  Rahul Khare; Branislav Jaramaz; Brian Hamlin; Kenneth L Urish
Journal:  Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon)       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.787

5.  Robotic arm-assisted vs conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of the effects on clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Fengjun Zhang; Hongcai Li; Zhaochen Ba; Chunguang Bo; Kai Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 6.  Robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a review.

Authors:  Pei Liu; Fei-Fan Lu; Guo-Jie Liu; Xiao-Hong Mu; Yong-Qiang Sun; Qi-Dong Zhang; Wei-Guo Wang; Wan-Shou Guo
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2021-05-02

7.  A perspective on robotic assistance for knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Nathan A Netravali; Feimo Shen; Youngbae Park; William L Bargar
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2013-04-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.