Literature DB >> 17517611

Pph3-Psy2 is a phosphatase complex required for Rad53 dephosphorylation and replication fork restart during recovery from DNA damage.

Bryan M O'Neill1, Shawn J Szyjka, Ewa T Lis, Aaron O Bailey, John R Yates, Oscar M Aparicio, Floyd E Romesberg.   

Abstract

Activation of the checkpoint kinase Rad53 is a critical response to DNA damage that results in stabilization of stalled replication forks, inhibition of late-origin initiation, up-regulation of dNTP levels, and delayed entry to mitosis. Activation of Rad53 is well understood and involves phosphorylation by the protein kinases Mec1 and Tel1 as well as in trans autophosphorylation by Rad53 itself. However, deactivation of Rad53, which must occur to allow the cell to recover from checkpoint arrest, is not well understood. Here, we present genetic and biochemical evidence that the type 2A-like protein phosphatase Pph3 forms a complex with Psy2 (Pph3-Psy2) that binds and dephosphorylates activated Rad53 during treatment with, and recovery from, methylmethane sulfonate-mediated DNA damage. In the absence of Pph3-Psy2, Rad53 dephosphorylation and the resumption of DNA synthesis are delayed during recovery from DNA damage. This delay in DNA synthesis reflects a failure to restart stalled replication forks, whereas, remarkably, genome replication is eventually completed by initiating late origins of replication despite the presence of hyperphosphorylated Rad53. These findings suggest that Rad53 regulates replication fork restart and initiation of late firing origins independently and that regulation of these processes is mediated by specific Rad53 phosphatases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17517611      PMCID: PMC1890487          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0703252104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  36 in total

1.  A role for Saccharomyces cerevisiae histone H2A in DNA repair.

Authors:  J A Downs; N F Lowndes; S P Jackson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000 Dec 21-28       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Budding yeast Rad9 is an ATP-dependent Rad53 activating machine.

Authors:  C S Gilbert; C M Green; N F Lowndes
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes.

Authors:  Anne-Claude Gavin; Markus Bösche; Roland Krause; Paola Grandi; Martina Marzioch; Andreas Bauer; Jörg Schultz; Jens M Rick; Anne-Marie Michon; Cristina-Maria Cruciat; Marita Remor; Christian Höfert; Malgorzata Schelder; Miro Brajenovic; Heinz Ruffner; Alejandro Merino; Karin Klein; Manuela Hudak; David Dickson; Tatjana Rudi; Volker Gnau; Angela Bauch; Sonja Bastuck; Bettina Huhse; Christina Leutwein; Marie-Anne Heurtier; Richard R Copley; Angela Edelmann; Erich Querfurth; Vladimir Rybin; Gerard Drewes; Manfred Raida; Tewis Bouwmeester; Peer Bork; Bertrand Seraphin; Bernhard Kuster; Gitte Neubauer; Giulio Superti-Furga
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-10       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Yuen Ho; Albrecht Gruhler; Adrian Heilbut; Gary D Bader; Lynda Moore; Sally-Lin Adams; Anna Millar; Paul Taylor; Keiryn Bennett; Kelly Boutilier; Lingyun Yang; Cheryl Wolting; Ian Donaldson; Søren Schandorff; Juanita Shewnarane; Mai Vo; Joanne Taggart; Marilyn Goudreault; Brenda Muskat; Cris Alfarano; Danielle Dewar; Zhen Lin; Katerina Michalickova; Andrew R Willems; Holly Sassi; Peter A Nielsen; Karina J Rasmussen; Jens R Andersen; Lene E Johansen; Lykke H Hansen; Hans Jespersen; Alexandre Podtelejnikov; Eva Nielsen; Janne Crawford; Vibeke Poulsen; Birgitte D Sørensen; Jesper Matthiesen; Ronald C Hendrickson; Frank Gleeson; Tony Pawson; Michael F Moran; Daniel Durocher; Matthias Mann; Christopher W V Hogue; Daniel Figeys; Mike Tyers
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-10       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Activation of the checkpoint kinase Rad53 by the phosphatidyl inositol kinase-like kinase Mec1.

Authors:  Jia-Lin Ma; Soo-Jung Lee; Jimmy K Duong; David F Stern
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-12-19       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Tof1p regulates DNA damage responses during S phase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  E J Foss
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology.

Authors:  M P Washburn; D Wolters; J R Yates
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 54.908

8.  A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  P Uetz; L Giot; G Cagney; T A Mansfield; R S Judson; J R Knight; D Lockshon; V Narayan; M Srinivasan; P Pochart; A Qureshi-Emili; Y Li; B Godwin; D Conover; T Kalbfleisch; G Vijayadamodar; M Yang; M Johnston; S Fields; J M Rothberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-02-10       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  CHK2 kinase--a busy messenger.

Authors:  J Bartek; J Falck; J Lukas
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 94.444

10.  The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks.

Authors:  M Lopes; C Cotta-Ramusino; A Pellicioli; G Liberi; P Plevani; M Muzi-Falconi; C S Newlon; M Foiani
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-08-02       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  71 in total

Review 1.  Functions and regulation of the Polo-like kinase Cdc5 in the absence and presence of DNA damage.

Authors:  Vladimir V Botchkarev; James E Haber
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 3.886

2.  ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling factors tune S phase checkpoint activity.

Authors:  Tracey J Au; Jairo Rodriguez; Jack A Vincent; Toshio Tsukiyama
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 3.  What goes on must come off: phosphatases gate-crash the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Dong-Hyun Lee; Dipanjan Chowdhury
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2011-09-18       Impact factor: 13.807

4.  Replication stress checkpoint signaling controls tRNA gene transcription.

Authors:  Vesna C Nguyen; Brett W Clelland; Darren J Hockman; Sonya L Kujat-Choy; Holly E Mewhort; Michael C Schultz
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2010-07-18       Impact factor: 15.369

Review 5.  Turning off the G2 DNA damage checkpoint.

Authors:  Teresa M Calonge; Matthew J O'Connell
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2007-09-11

6.  Identification of pathways controlling DNA damage induced mutation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Ewa T Lis; Bryan M O'Neill; Cristina Gil-Lamaignere; Jodie K Chin; Floyd E Romesberg
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2008-04-08

7.  Psy2 targets the PP4 family phosphatase Pph3 to dephosphorylate Mth1 and repress glucose transporter gene expression.

Authors:  Hui Ma; Bong-Kwan Han; Marisela Guaderrama; Aaron Aslanian; John R Yates; Tony Hunter; Curt Wittenberg
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Dampening DNA damage checkpoint signalling via coordinated BRCT domain interactions.

Authors:  José R Cussiol; Carolyn M Jablonowski; Askar Yimit; Grant W Brown; Marcus B Smolka
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Acetylated lysine 56 on histone H3 drives chromatin assembly after repair and signals for the completion of repair.

Authors:  Chin-Chuan Chen; Joshua J Carson; Jason Feser; Beth Tamburini; Susan Zabaronick; Jeffrey Linger; Jessica K Tyler
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Cdc28/Cdk1 positively and negatively affects genome stability in S. cerevisiae.

Authors:  Jorrit M Enserink; Hans Hombauer; Meng-Er Huang; Richard D Kolodner
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2009-04-27       Impact factor: 10.539

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.