Literature DB >> 17517061

Histodynamics of bone tissue formation around immediately loaded cylindrical implants in the rabbit.

Katleen Vandamme1, Ignace Naert, Liesbet Geris, Jozef Vander Sloten, Robert Puers, Joke Duyck.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The local mechanical environment influences early peri-implant tissue formation. It is still unclear whether immediate loading limits or promotes peri-implant osteogenesis and which mechanical parameters are important herein. The present study evaluated the influence of well-controlled mechanical stimuli on the tissue response around immediately loaded cylindrical turned titanium implants at two different observation periods.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A repeated sampling bone chamber, consisting of dual-structure perforated hollow cylinders with a cylindrical implant, was installed in the tibia of 14 rabbits and used to conduct three displacement-controlled immediate loading experiments: (i) 30 microm - 400 cycles/day - 1 Hz frequency - 2 x/week - 6 weeks; (ii) 30 microm - 400 cycles/day - 1 Hz - 2 x/week - 6 weeks, followed by another 6 weeks with a 50 microm - 800 cycles/day - 1 Hz - 2 x/week loading protocol; and (iii) 0 microm implant displacement for 12 weeks. A linear mixed model and logistic mixed model with alpha=5% were conducted on the data set.
RESULTS: The tissue area fraction was significantly the highest after 12 weeks of loading. The bone area fraction was significantly different between all three loading conditions, with the highest values for the 12-week loading experiment. Twelve-week stimulation resulted in a significantly higher mineralized bone fraction than 6 weeks. Loading did have a significantly positive effect on the mineralized bone fraction. The incidence of osteoid-to-implant and bone-to-implant contact increased significantly when loading the implant for 12 weeks.
CONCLUSION: Immediate loading had a positive effect on the tissue differentiation and bone formation around cylindrical turned titanium implants. Controlled implant micro-motion up to 50 microm had a positive effect on the bone formation at its interface.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17517061     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01339.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  10 in total

1.  Stability analysis for a peri-implant osseointegration model.

Authors:  Pavel Prokharau; Fred Vermolen
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2012-02-11       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Cancellous bone osseointegration is enhanced by in vivo loading.

Authors:  Bettina M Willie; Xu Yang; Natalie H Kelly; Jane Han; Turya Nair; Timothy M Wright; Marjolein C H van der Meulen; Mathias P G Bostrom
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2010-05-22       Impact factor: 3.056

3.  Time course of peri-implant bone regeneration around loaded and unloaded implants in a rat model.

Authors:  Shailly H Jariwala; Hwabok Wee; Evan P Roush; Tiffany L Whitcomb; Christopher Murter; Gery Kozlansky; Akhlesh Lakhtakia; Allen R Kunselman; Henry J Donahue; April D Armstrong; Gregory S Lewis
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Micro/nanostructural properties of peri-implant jaw bones: a human cadaver study.

Authors:  Kazuto Koresawa; Satoru Matsunaga; Atsuhiko Hikita; Hajime Okudera; Akira Yamaguchi; Yasutomo Yajima; Shinichi Abe
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2022-04-11

5.  A Patient Specific Biomechanical Analysis of Custom Root Analogue Implant Designs on Alveolar Bone Stress: A Finite Element Study.

Authors:  David Anssari Moin; Bassam Hassan; Daniel Wismeijer
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2016-05-04

6.  System for application of controlled forces on dental implants in rat maxillae: Influence of the number of load cycles on bone healing.

Authors:  Renan de Barros E Lima Bueno; Ana P Dias; Katia J Ponce; John B Brunski; Antonio Nanci
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 3.368

7.  Effects of immediate and delayed loading protocols on marginal bone loss around implants in unsplinted mandibular implant-retained overdentures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wei Liu; He Cai; Junjiang Zhang; Jian Wang; Lei Sui
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 2.757

8.  The limit of tolerable micromotion for implant osseointegration: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nupur Kohli; Jennifer C Stoddart; Richard J van Arkel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Patient-specific three-dimensional evaluation of interface micromotion in two different short stem designs in cementless total hip arthroplasty: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Arata Kanaizumi; Daisuke Suzuki; Satoshi Nagoya; Atsushi Teramoto; Toshihiko Yamashita
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 2.677

10.  Bone healing response in cyclically loaded implants: Comparing zero, one, and two loading sessions per day.

Authors:  Renan de Barros E Lima Bueno; Ana Paula Dias; Katia J Ponce; Rima Wazen; John B Brunski; Antonio Nanci
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2018-05-31
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.