Literature DB >> 17515259

Carotid endarterectomy versus carotid stenting: an updated review of randomized trials and subgroup analyses.

A Kastrup1, K Gröschel.   

Abstract

Atherosclerotic disease of the carotid arteries is responsible for a significant portion of ischemic strokes. Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is currently the accepted standard of treatment for patients with severe symptomatic carotid stenosis. In the past few years, however, carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) has emerged as a potential alternative endovascular treatment strategy for this disorder. In fact, spurred by the positive results of single center studies and small, pivotal randomized trials, some even consider CAS as the treatment modality of choice, especially in presumably surgical high-risk patients. Yet, randomized trials directly comparing CAS with CEA are sparse and have produced conflicting results. The aim of this article is to review the current trial data on this issue and to define the role of these techniques for the management of two important subgroups of patients. An updated meta-analysis of seven randomized trials comparing CEA with CAS demonstrates that CAS is associated with a significantly increased risk of any stroke or death within 30 days (OR. 1.41, 95% CI 1.07-1.87, p < 0.05). Focusing on patients with a symptomatic carotid stenosis, there was also a significant difference in the odds of treatment-related stroke and death between CAS and CEA (OR, 1.41 ; CI 1.05 to 1.88, p < 0.05). Data on all disabling strokes and deaths within 30 days was available from five trials. The odds of disabling stroke or death at 30 days were similar in the endovascular and surgical group (OR, 1.33, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.98). Overall, these data do not justify a blind enthusiasm for CAS and a widespread use of this procedure for the treatment of carotid artery stenosis. On the other hand, a closer inspection of the current literature on elderly patients and those with a contralateral carotid occlusion clearly indicates that CAS and CEA already now have a complementary role. While elderly patients should preferentially be treated with CEA, CAS appears to be the treatment of choice in patients with a symptomatic carotid artery stenosis and a contralateral carotid occlusion in experienced centers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17515259

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Chir Belg        ISSN: 0001-5458            Impact factor:   1.090


  8 in total

1.  [European Stroke Organisation 2008 guidelines for managing acute cerebral infarction or transient ischemic attack : part 2].

Authors:  P D Schellinger; P Ringleb; W Hacke
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 2.  [Extracranial carotid stenosis: diagnostics, therapy and follow-up].

Authors:  W Reith
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Does a contralateral carotid occlusion adversely impact carotid artery stenting outcomes?

Authors:  Mark L Keldahl; Michael S Park; Manuel Garcia-Toca; Chih-Hsiung E Wang; Melina R Kibbe; Heron E Rodriguez; Mark D Morasch; Mark K Eskandari
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 1.466

4.  [Carotid artery stenting technique].

Authors:  J Schofer; K Bijuklic
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.443

5.  Clinical impact and predictors of carotid artery in-stent restenosis.

Authors:  Katrin Wasser; Sonja Schnaudigel; Janin Wohlfahrt; Marios-Nikos Psychogios; Peter Schramm; Michael Knauth; Klaus Gröschel
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Inflammation and in-stent restenosis: the role of serum markers and stent characteristics in carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  Katrin Wasser; Sonja Schnaudigel; Janin Wohlfahrt; Marios-Nikos Psychogios; Michael Knauth; Klaus Gröschel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Expression profiles in surgically-induced carotid stenosis: a combined transcriptomic and proteomic investigation.

Authors:  A Forte; M Finicelli; P De Luca; C Quarto; F Onorati; P Santè; A Renzulli; U Galderisi; L Berrino; M De Feo; F Rossi; M Cotrufo; A Cascino; M Cipollaro
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.310

8.  Plaque morphology detected with Duplex ultrasound before carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) is not a predictor of carotid artery in-stent restenosis, a case control study.

Authors:  Katrin Wasser; André Karch; Sonja Gröschel; Janin Witzenhausen; Klaus Gröschel; Mathias Bähr; Jan Liman
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 2.474

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.