PURPOSE: To compare contrast-enhanced, T1-weighted, three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (CEMR) and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (T2MR) with computed tomography (CT) for prostate brachytherapy seed location for dosimetric calculations. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Postbrachytherapy prostate MRI was performed on a 1.5 Tesla unit with combined surface and endorectal coils in 13 patients. Both CEMR and T2MR used a section thickness of 3 mm. Spiral CT used a section thickness of 5 mm with a pitch factor of 1.5. All images were obtained in the transverse plane. Two readers using CT and MR imaging assessed brachytherapy seed distribution independently. The dependency of data read by both readers for a specific subject was assessed with a linear mixed effects model. RESULTS: The mean percentage (+/- standard deviation) values of the readers for seed detection and location are presented. Of 1205 implanted seeds, CEMR, T2MR, and CT detected 91.5% +/- 4.8%, 78.5% +/- 8.5%, and 96.1% +/- 2.3%, respectively, with 11.8% +/- 4.5%, 8.5% +/- 3.5%, 1.9% +/- 1.0% extracapsular, respectively. Assignment to periprostatic structures was not possible with CT. Periprostatic seed assignments for CEMR and T2MR, respectively, were as follows: neurovascular bundle, 3.5% +/- 1.6% and 2.1% +/- 0.9%; seminal vesicles, 0.9% +/- 1.8% and 0.3% +/- 0.7%; periurethral, 7.1% +/- 3.3% and 5.8% +/- 2.9%; penile bulb, 0.6% +/- 0.8% and 0.3% +/- 0.6%; Denonvillier's Fascia/rectal wall, 0.5% +/- 0.6% and 0%; and urinary bladder, 0.1% +/- 0.3% and 0%. Data dependency analysis showed statistical significance for the type of imaging but not for reader identification. CONCLUSION: Both enumeration and localization of implanted seeds are readily accomplished with CEMR. Calculations with MRI dosimetry do not require CT data. Dose determinations to specific extracapsular sites can be obtained with MRI but not with CT.
PURPOSE: To compare contrast-enhanced, T1-weighted, three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (CEMR) and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (T2MR) with computed tomography (CT) for prostate brachytherapy seed location for dosimetric calculations. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Postbrachytherapy prostate MRI was performed on a 1.5 Tesla unit with combined surface and endorectal coils in 13 patients. Both CEMR and T2MR used a section thickness of 3 mm. Spiral CT used a section thickness of 5 mm with a pitch factor of 1.5. All images were obtained in the transverse plane. Two readers using CT and MR imaging assessed brachytherapy seed distribution independently. The dependency of data read by both readers for a specific subject was assessed with a linear mixed effects model. RESULTS: The mean percentage (+/- standard deviation) values of the readers for seed detection and location are presented. Of 1205 implanted seeds, CEMR, T2MR, and CT detected 91.5% +/- 4.8%, 78.5% +/- 8.5%, and 96.1% +/- 2.3%, respectively, with 11.8% +/- 4.5%, 8.5% +/- 3.5%, 1.9% +/- 1.0% extracapsular, respectively. Assignment to periprostatic structures was not possible with CT. Periprostatic seed assignments for CEMR and T2MR, respectively, were as follows: neurovascular bundle, 3.5% +/- 1.6% and 2.1% +/- 0.9%; seminal vesicles, 0.9% +/- 1.8% and 0.3% +/- 0.7%; periurethral, 7.1% +/- 3.3% and 5.8% +/- 2.9%; penile bulb, 0.6% +/- 0.8% and 0.3% +/- 0.6%; Denonvillier's Fascia/rectal wall, 0.5% +/- 0.6% and 0%; and urinary bladder, 0.1% +/- 0.3% and 0%. Data dependency analysis showed statistical significance for the type of imaging but not for reader identification. CONCLUSION: Both enumeration and localization of implanted seeds are readily accomplished with CEMR. Calculations with MRI dosimetry do not require CT data. Dose determinations to specific extracapsular sites can be obtained with MRI but not with CT.
Authors: Stephan H Polanec; Katja Pinker-Domenig; Peter Brader; Dietmar Georg; Shahrokh Shariat; Claudio Spick; Martin Susani; Thomas H Helbich; Pascal A Baltzer Journal: World J Urol Date: 2015-09-25 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Geoffrey V Martin; Thomas J Pugh; Usama Mahmood; Rajat J Kudchadker; Jihong Wang; Teresa L Bruno; Tharakeswara Bathala; Pierre Blanchard; Steven J Frank Journal: Brachytherapy Date: 2017-05-10 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: B J Fueger; T H Helbich; M Schernthaner; S Zbýn; H G Linhart; A Stiglbauer; A Doan; K Pinker; G Heinz; A R Padhani; P Brader Journal: Radiologe Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 0.635
Authors: Karen Buch; Tye Morancy; Irving Kaplan; Muhammad M Qureshi; Ariel E Hirsch; Neil M Rofksy; Edward Holupka; Renee Oismueller; Robert Hawliczek; Thomas H Helbich; B Nicolas Bloch Journal: J Contemp Brachytherapy Date: 2014-10-28