Literature DB >> 17512192

Value of complete metabolic response by (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography in oesophageal cancer for prediction of pathologic response and survival after preoperative chemoradiotherapy.

Min Kyoung Kim1, Jin-Sook Ryu, Sung-Bae Kim, Jin Hee Ahn, Soo Young Kim, Seung-Ii Park, Yong Hee Kim, Ho Yong Song, Ji Hoon Shin, Hwoon Yong Jung, Gin Hyug Lee, Kee Don Choi, Kyung-Ja Cho, Jong Hoon Kim.   

Abstract

We aimed to assess the ability of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) scan to predict pathologic complete response (CR) and survival in patients with oesophageal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT). The study cohort consisted of 62 consecutive patients with operable oesophageal cancer who were treated with preoperative CRT followed by oesophagectomy. Endoscopy, computed tomography (CT) and PET were performed before and after CRT. Of the 62 patients, 56 (90%) patients responded to preoperative CRT. FDG-PET-determined complete metabolic response (CMR) was achieved by 33 patients (54.1%), whereas pathologic CR was achieved by 28 patients (45.2%). Compared with endoscopic biopsy or CT scan, CMR by FDG-PET showed the highest correlation with pathologic CR (concordance, 71%). At a median follow-up of 19.3 months (range, 3.9-57.1 months), median overall survival (OS) was not reached in patients with CMR compared to 22.4 months in patients who did not achieve CMR. Median disease free survival (DFS) was not reached in patients with CMR compared to 17.4 months in patients who did not achieve CMR. By multivariate analysis, CMR by FDG-PET was significantly associated with better DFS and OS (P=0.006, P=0.033, respectively). The variables associated with pre-CRT PET scan were not predictive of survival. In conclusion, CMR by FDG-PET has a significant correlation with pathologic CR and can predict the long-term outcome in oesophageal cancer patients undergoing CRT. Although surgery is standard treatment for respectable oesophageal cancer, currently even in patients with CMR, the addition of (18)F-FDG-PET could be used to select the patient subgroup not requiring surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17512192     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  36 in total

1.  Symptomatic cardiac toxicity is predicted by dosimetric and patient factors rather than changes in 18F-FDG PET determination of myocardial activity after chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Andre Konski; Tianyu Li; Michael Christensen; Jonathan D Cheng; Jian Q Yu; Kevin Crawford; Oleh Haluszka; Jeffrey Tokar; Walter Scott; Neal J Meropol; Steven J Cohen; Alan Maurer; Gary M Freedman
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 6.280

2.  Positron emission tomography's changing significance in the treatment of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Shane Hopkins; Gary Yang
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2009-10-15

3.  The role of qualitative and quantitative analysis of F18-FDG positron emission tomography in predicting pathologic response following chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Tracy Klayton; Tianyu Li; Jian Q Yu; Lanea Keller; Jonathan Cheng; Steven J Cohen; Neal J Meropol; Walter Scott; Meng Xu-Welliver; Andre Konski
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2012-12

4.  Favorable versus unfavorable prognostic groups by post-chemoradiation FDG-PET imaging in node-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Wing-Keen Yap; Yu-Chuan Chang; Chia-Hsun Hsieh; Yin-Kai Chao; Chien-Cheng Chen; Ming-Chieh Shih; Tsung-Min Hung
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Change in volume parameters induced by neoadjuvant chemotherapy provide accurate prediction of overall survival after resection in patients with oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Dietmar Tamandl; Richard M Gore; Barbara Fueger; Patrick Kinsperger; Michael Hejna; Matthias Paireder; Alexander Haug; Sebastian F Schoppmann; Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Clinical tools to predict outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiation: are we there yet?

Authors:  Abraham J Wu; Karyn A Goodman
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-02

Review 7.  State-of-the-art molecular imaging in esophageal cancer management: implications for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment.

Authors:  Jolinta Lin; Seth Kligerman; Rakhi Goel; Payam Sajedi; Mohan Suntharalingam; Michael D Chuong
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-02

Review 8.  Role of salvage esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Yuji Tachimori
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-02-12

Review 9.  Tumour response evaluation with fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography: research technique or clinical tool?

Authors:  H Anderson; N Singh; K Miles
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 3.909

10.  Predictive and prognostic value of metabolic tumour volume and total lesion glycolysis in solid tumours.

Authors:  Christophe Van de Wiele; Vibeke Kruse; Peter Smeets; Mike Sathekge; Alex Maes
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.