BACKGROUND: Previous research examining the amygdala volumes in major depressive disorder (MDD) has found conflicting evidence for association. Furthermore, few of these studies have examined differences in individuals with an onset during childhood or adolescence. This study examined amygdala volume and its potential association with early onset major depression. METHODS: A community-based sample of 47 right-handed young adult female monozygotic and dizygotic twin pairs was examined. For 29 twin pairs, one twin per pair had a lifetime history of MDD, while 18 age-matched control twin pairs had no lifetime history of MDD or other Axis I disorder. Core, noncore, and total amygdala volumes were estimated based on a combination of manual tracing, automated segmentation, and expert rater regional boundary definitions. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in amygdala volumes between depressed, high-risk, or control subjects. However, analyses comparing control monozygotic twins to randomly created control subject pairs suggest that there are familial, perhaps genetic, influences on core and total amygdala volumes. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that although there were no significant differences in amygdala volumes between groups, familial factors influence amygdala volumes. Discrepancies between studies measuring amygdala volume in MDD may be due to differences in amygdala boundary definitions.
BACKGROUND: Previous research examining the amygdala volumes in major depressive disorder (MDD) has found conflicting evidence for association. Furthermore, few of these studies have examined differences in individuals with an onset during childhood or adolescence. This study examined amygdala volume and its potential association with early onset major depression. METHODS: A community-based sample of 47 right-handed young adult female monozygotic and dizygotic twin pairs was examined. For 29 twin pairs, one twin per pair had a lifetime history of MDD, while 18 age-matched control twin pairs had no lifetime history of MDD or other Axis I disorder. Core, noncore, and total amygdala volumes were estimated based on a combination of manual tracing, automated segmentation, and expert rater regional boundary definitions. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in amygdala volumes between depressed, high-risk, or control subjects. However, analyses comparing control monozygotic twins to randomly created control subject pairs suggest that there are familial, perhaps genetic, influences on core and total amygdala volumes. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that although there were no significant differences in amygdala volumes between groups, familial factors influence amygdala volumes. Discrepancies between studies measuring amygdala volume in MDD may be due to differences in amygdala boundary definitions.
Authors: E Mervaala; J Föhr; M Könönen; M Valkonen-Korhonen; P Vainio; K Partanen; J Partanen; J Tiihonen; H Viinamäki; A K Karjalainen; J Lehtonen Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: T E Goldberg; E F Torrey; J M Gold; L B Bigelow; R D Ragland; E Taylor; D R Weinberger Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 1995-09 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: K M Thomas; W C Drevets; R E Dahl; N D Ryan; B Birmaher; C H Eccard; D Axelson; P J Whalen; B J Casey Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2001-11
Authors: Jens Foell; Isabella M Palumbo; James R Yancey; Nathalie Vizueta; Traute Demirakca; Christopher J Patrick Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2018-10-28 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Michael I Miller; Laurent Younes; J Tilak Ratnanather; Timothy Brown; Tommy Reigel; Huong Trinh; Xiaoying Tang; Peter Barker; Susumu Mori; Marilyn Albert Journal: Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv Date: 2012-10
Authors: Jorge Jovicich; Silvester Czanner; Xiao Han; David Salat; Andre van der Kouwe; Brian Quinn; Jenni Pacheco; Marilyn Albert; Ronald Killiany; Deborah Blacker; Paul Maguire; Diana Rosas; Nikos Makris; Randy Gollub; Anders Dale; Bradford C Dickerson; Bruce Fischl Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2009-02-20 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: P Cédric M P Koolschijn; Neeltje E M van Haren; Gerty J L M Lensvelt-Mulders; Hilleke E Hulshoff Pol; René S Kahn Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Robert J Tamburo; Greg J Siegle; George D Stetten; C Aaron Cois; Meryl A Butters; Charles F Reynolds; Howard J Aizenstein Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 3.485