Literature DB >> 17511872

Non-surgical spinal decompression therapy: does the scientific literature support efficacy claims made in the advertising media?

Dwain M Daniel1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Traction therapy has been utilized in the treatment of low back pain for decades. The most recent incarnation of traction therapy is non-surgical spinal decompression therapy which can cost over $100,000. This form of therapy has been heavily marketed to manual therapy professions and subsequently to the consumer. The purpose of this paper is to initiate a debate pertaining to the relationship between marketing claims and the scientific literature on non-surgical spinal decompression. DISCUSSION: Only one small randomized controlled trial and several lower level efficacy studies have been performed on spinal decompression therapy. In general the quality of these studies is questionable. Many of the studies were performed using the VAX-D unit which places the patient in a prone position. Often companies utilize this research for their marketing although their units place the patient in the supine position.
SUMMARY: Only limited evidence is available to warrant the routine use of non-surgical spinal decompression, particularly when many other well investigated, less expensive alternatives are available.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 17511872      PMCID: PMC1887522          DOI: 10.1186/1746-1340-15-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chiropr Osteopat        ISSN: 1746-1340


  8 in total

1.  Sudden progression of lumbar disk protrusion during vertebral axial decompression traction therapy.

Authors:  H Gordon Deen; Thomas D Rizzo; Douglas S Fenton
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Quantitative sensory testing: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.

Authors:  M E Shy; E M Frohman; Y T So; J C Arezzo; D R Cornblath; M J Giuliani; J C Kincaid; J L Ochoa; G J Parry; L H Weimer
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2003-03-25       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Efficacy of vertebral axial decompression on chronic low back pain: study of dosage regimen.

Authors:  Gustavo Ramos
Journal:  Neurol Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.448

4.  Vertebral axial decompression therapy for pain associated with herniated or degenerated discs or facet syndrome: an outcome study.

Authors:  E E Gose; W K Naguszewski; R K Naguszewski
Journal:  Neurol Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.448

5.  Dermatomal somatosensory evoked potential demonstration of nerve root decompression after VAX-D therapy.

Authors:  W K Naguszewski; R K Naguszewski; E E Gose
Journal:  Neurol Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.448

6.  A prospective randomized controlled study of VAX-D and TENS for the treatment of chronic low back pain.

Authors:  E Sherry; P Kitchener; R Smart
Journal:  Neurol Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.448

Review 7.  Systematic literature review of spinal decompression via motorized traction for chronic discogenic low back pain.

Authors:  Alex Macario; Joseph V Pergolizzi
Journal:  Pain Pract       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.183

8.  Effects of vertebral axial decompression on intradiscal pressure.

Authors:  G Ramos; W Martin
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 5.115

  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  Radiographic disk height increase after a trial of multimodal spine rehabilitation and vibration traction: a retrospective case series.

Authors:  Ian Horseman; Mark W Morningstar
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2008-12

2.  Chiropractic management of a 47-year-old firefighter with lumbar disk extrusion.

Authors:  Matthew J Schwab
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2008-12

3.  Comparison of the short-term effects of the conventional motorized traction with non-surgical spinal decompression performed with a DRX9000 device on pain, functionality, depression, and quality of life in patients with low back pain associated with lumbar disc herniation: A single-blind randomized-controlled trial.

Authors:  Fatmanur Aybala Koçak; Hakan Tunç; Serap Tomruk Sütbeyaz; Selami Akkuş; Belma Füsun Köseoğlu; Ebru Yılmaz
Journal:  Turk J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-02-16

4.  Subgrouping patients with low back pain: a treatment-based approach to classification.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Hebert; Shane L Koppenhaver; Bruce F Walker
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.843

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.