Literature DB >> 11680522

A prospective randomized controlled study of VAX-D and TENS for the treatment of chronic low back pain.

E Sherry1, P Kitchener, R Smart.   

Abstract

Low back pain is one of the most significant medical and socioeconomic problems in modern society. International guidelines call for evidence-based management for the pain and disability associated with musculoskeletal disorders. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to address the question of efficacy and appropriateness of vertebral axial decompression (VAX-D) therapy, a new technology that has been shown in clinical research to create negative intradiscal pressures, and has been shown to be effective in treating patients presenting with chronic low back pain (> 3 months duration) with associated leg pain. Successful outcome was defined as a 50% reduction in pain utilizing a 10 cm Visual Analog Pain Scale and an improvement in the level of functioning as measured by patient-nominated disability ratings. Patients were randomly assigned to VAX-D or to TENS which was used as a control treatment or placebo. The TENS treatment demonstrated a success rate of 0%, while VAX-D demonstrated a success rate of 68.4% (p < 0.001). A statistically significant reduction in pain and improvement in functional outcome was obtained in patients with chronic low back pain treated with VAX-D.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11680522     DOI: 10.1179/016164101101199180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Res        ISSN: 0161-6412            Impact factor:   2.448


  11 in total

1.  Stress in lumbar intervertebral discs during distraction: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Ralph E Gay; Brice Ilharreborde; Kristin D Zhao; Lawrence J Berglund; Gert Bronfort; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 2.  Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) versus placebo for chronic low-back pain.

Authors:  Amole Khadilkar; Daniel Oluwafemi Odebiyi; Lucie Brosseau; George A Wells
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-10-08

Review 3.  Imperfect placebos are common in low back pain trials: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  L A C Machado; S J Kamper; R D Herbert; C G Maher; J H McAuley
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Traction for low-back pain with or without sciatica.

Authors:  Inge Wegner; Indah S Widyahening; Maurits W van Tulder; Stefan E I Blomberg; Henrica Cw de Vet; Gert Brønfort; Lex M Bouter; Geert J van der Heijden
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-08-19

Review 5.  Characterising the Features of 381 Clinical Studies Evaluating Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Pain Relief: A Secondary Analysis of the Meta-TENS Study to Improve Future Research.

Authors:  Mark I Johnson; Carole A Paley; Priscilla G Wittkopf; Matthew R Mulvey; Gareth Jones
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 2.948

6.  Radiographic disk height increase after a trial of multimodal spine rehabilitation and vibration traction: a retrospective case series.

Authors:  Ian Horseman; Mark W Morningstar
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2008-12

7.  Non-surgical spinal decompression therapy: does the scientific literature support efficacy claims made in the advertising media?

Authors:  Dwain M Daniel
Journal:  Chiropr Osteopat       Date:  2007-05-18

8.  Comparison of the short-term effects of the conventional motorized traction with non-surgical spinal decompression performed with a DRX9000 device on pain, functionality, depression, and quality of life in patients with low back pain associated with lumbar disc herniation: A single-blind randomized-controlled trial.

Authors:  Fatmanur Aybala Koçak; Hakan Tunç; Serap Tomruk Sütbeyaz; Selami Akkuş; Belma Füsun Köseoğlu; Ebru Yılmaz
Journal:  Turk J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-02-16

9.  Assessment of variability in traction interventions for patients with low back pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Muhammad Alrwaily; Mohammed Almutiri; Michael Schneider
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2018-09-17

10.  The effectiveness of motorised lumbar traction in the management of LBP with lumbo sacral nerve root involvement: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Annette A Harte; George D Baxter; Jacqueline H Gracey
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.