Literature DB >> 17510356

Childhood origins of adult resistance to science.

Paul Bloom1, Deena Skolnick Weisberg.   

Abstract

Resistance to certain scientific ideas derives in large part from assumptions and biases that can be demonstrated experimentally in young children and that may persist into adulthood. In particular, both adults and children resist acquiring scientific information that clashes with common-sense intuitions about the physical and psychological domains. Additionally, when learning information from other people, both adults and children are sensitive to the trustworthiness of the source of that information. Resistance to science, then, is particularly exaggerated in societies where nonscientific ideologies have the advantages of being both grounded in common sense and transmitted by trustworthy sources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17510356     DOI: 10.1126/science.1133398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  15 in total

Review 1.  The research dynamic: a professional development model for secondary school science teachers.

Authors:  Philip M Silverman
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Development of the use of conversational cues to assess reality status.

Authors:  Jacqueline D Woolley; Lili Ma; Gabriel Lopez-Mobilia
Journal:  J Cogn Dev       Date:  2011-01-01

Review 3.  Gamble with Your Head and Not Your Heart: A Conceptual Model for How Thinking-Style Promotes Irrational Gambling Beliefs.

Authors:  Tess Armstrong; Matthew Rockloff; Matthew Browne
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2020-03

4.  The Einstein effect provides global evidence for scientific source credibility effects and the influence of religiosity.

Authors:  Suzanne Hoogeveen; Julia M Haaf; Joseph A Bulbulia; Robert M Ross; Ryan McKay; Sacha Altay; Theiss Bendixen; Renatas Berniūnas; Arik Cheshin; Claudio Gentili; Raluca Georgescu; Will M Gervais; Kristin Hagel; Christopher Kavanagh; Neil Levy; Alejandra Neely; Lin Qiu; André Rabelo; Jonathan E Ramsay; Bastiaan T Rutjens; Hugh Turpin; Filip Uzarevic; Robin Wuyts; Dimitris Xygalatas; Michiel van Elk
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2022-02-07

Review 5.  Revisiting the fantasy-reality distinction: children as naïve skeptics.

Authors:  Jacqueline D Woolley; Maliki E Ghossainy
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2013-03-15

6.  No departure to "Pandora"? Using critical phenomenology to differentiate "naive" from "reflective" experience in psychiatry and psychosomatic medicine (a comment on Schwartz and Wiggins, 2010).

Authors:  Jann E Schlimme; Catharina Bonnemann; Aaron L Mishara
Journal:  Philos Ethics Humanit Med       Date:  2010-10-31       Impact factor: 2.464

7.  Variable cultural acquisition costs constrain cumulative cultural evolution.

Authors:  Alex Mesoudi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Illusions of causality: how they bias our everyday thinking and how they could be reduced.

Authors:  Helena Matute; Fernando Blanco; Ion Yarritu; Marcos Díaz-Lago; Miguel A Vadillo; Itxaso Barberia
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-02

9.  The value of partnerships in science education: a win-win situation.

Authors:  Sonsoles de Lacalle; Angellah Petruso
Journal:  J Undergrad Neurosci Educ       Date:  2012-10-15

10.  Implementation and assessment of an intervention to debias adolescents against causal illusions.

Authors:  Itxaso Barberia; Fernando Blanco; Carmelo P Cubillas; Helena Matute
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.