Literature DB >> 17509900

Nonprosthetic glenoid arthroplasty with humeral hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty yield similar self-assessed outcomes in the management of comparable patients with glenohumeral arthritis.

Jeremiah Clinton1, Amy K Franta, Tim R Lenters, Doug Mounce, Frederick A Matsen.   

Abstract

The risk of glenoid component failure has led us to explore nonprosthetic glenoid arthroplasty coupled with humeral hemiarthroplasty, the "ream and run" (R&R) procedure, for the management of glenohumeral arthritis in active patients. We hypothesized that patients having a R&R procedure would have outcomes comparable with those of similar patients having a total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). A case-matched control study compared 35 consecutive patients (32 men, 3 women) with an average age of 56 years, after R&R with matched controls having TSA. The respective Simple Shoulder Test (SST) scores for the R&R and TSA groups were 4.5 and 4.0 before surgery, 7.8 and 9.6 at 12 months, 8.3 and 10.2 at 18 months, 8.9 and 9.4 at 24 months, 9.4 and 9.6 at 30 months, and 9.5 and 10.0 at 36 months. The "ream and run" procedure can offer similar functional recovery to patients with total shoulder arthroplasty, although the time to recovery may be longer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17509900     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2006.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  10 in total

1.  Glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Michael Thomas; Amit Bidwai; Amar Rangan; Jonathan L Rees; Peter Brownson; Duncan Tennent; Clare Connor; Rohit Kulkarni
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2016-04-25

2.  The glenoid in total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mark Schrumpf; Travis Maak; Sommer Hammoud; Edward V Craig
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2011-12

3.  The ream and run: not for every patient, every surgeon or every problem.

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  What Factors are Predictive of Patient-reported Outcomes? A Prospective Study of 337 Shoulder Arthroplasties.

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen; Stacy M Russ; Phuong T Vu; Jason E Hsu; Robert M Lucas; Bryan A Comstock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Assessment of glenoid chondral healing: comparison of microfracture to autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis in a novel rabbit shoulder model.

Authors:  Vincent M Wang; Vasili Karas; Andrew S Lee; Ziying Yin; Geoffrey S Van Thiel; Kristen Hussey; D Rick Sumner; Susan Chubinskaya; Richard L Magin; Nikhil N Verma; Anthony A Romeo; Brian J Cole
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  In vitro comparison of wear characteristics of PyroCarbon and metal on bone: Shoulder hemiarthroplasty.

Authors:  Jerome J Klawitter; Jason Patton; Robert More; Noel Peter; Evgeny Podnos; Mark Ross
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2018-09-11

Review 7.  Wireless Technologies for Implantable Devices.

Authors:  Bradley D Nelson; Salil Sidharthan Karipott; Yvonne Wang; Keat Ghee Ong
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-08-16       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty with All-Polyethylene Glenoid Component for Primary Osteoarthritis with Glenoid Deficiencies.

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen; Anastasia J Whitson; Jeremy S Somerson; Jason E Hsu
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2020-11-17

Review 9.  [Shoulder arthroplasty for treatment of the sequelae of proximal humerus fractures].

Authors:  U Brunner; S Köhler
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.004

10.  Primary Shoulder Hemiarthroplasty: What Can Be Learned From 359 Cases That Were Surgically Revised?

Authors:  Daniel J Hackett; Jason E Hsu; Frederick A Matsen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 4.176

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.