Literature DB >> 1750941

Precision acromioplasty in arthroscopic subacromial decompression of the shoulder.

T G Sampson1, J K Nisbet, J M Glick.   

Abstract

Arthroscopic techniques for subacromial decompression have been criticized for lack of precision in resecting the anterior acromial undersurface and evaluating the amount of bone resected. The goal of subacromial decompression is production of a flat undersurface for the acromion and acromioclavicular joint, thus enlarging the supraspinatus outlet and deterring impingement. Achieving this goal using the arthroscope requires preoperative evaluation of the acromial morphology, planning of the dimensions of bony resection, a reproducible acromioplasty method with intraoperative evaluation of the adequacy of resection, and postoperative confirmation of the resulting acromial shape. A precise technique for arthroscopic acromioplasty has been developed in the course of performing over 200 shoulder arthroscopies. This method adheres to conventional open surgical goals for bony resection and allows for reliable intraoperative evaluation of the result. Using this technique, over 90% good and excellent results may be achieved in treatment of stage II subacromial impingement syndrome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1750941     DOI: 10.1016/0749-8063(91)90132-h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  6 in total

1.  The CARE technique: arthroscopic CoracoAcromial ligament RE-attachment.

Authors:  Paolo Arrigoni; Pietro Randelli; Marco Filiputti; Paolo Cabitza; Luca Vaienti
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2010-05

2.  Time and cost savings in arthroscopic subacromial decompression: the use of bipolar versus monopolar radiofrequency.

Authors:  Mohammed A Diab; G N Fernandez; Kareem Elsorafy
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  [Arthroscopy of the shoulder joint. Technique, indications, surgery and complications].

Authors:  K B Brülhart; A Roggo; T Kossmann; C Duff; R Schimmer; W Glinz
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1993

4.  Prospective randomised comparison of arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair of the supraspinatus tendon.

Authors:  Philip Kasten; Christoph Keil; Thomas Grieser; Patric Raiss; Nikolaus Streich; Markus Loew
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Comparison of two arthroscopic repair techniques for small-medium supraspinatus tendon tear: 1 triple-loaded vs 2 double-loaded metallic sutures anchors.

Authors:  Massimiliano Piatti; Massimo Gorla; Marco Turati; Robert J Omeljaniuk; Diego Gaddi; Marco Bigoni
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2022-07-09

6.  Release of growth factors after arthroscopic acromioplasty.

Authors:  Pietro Randelli; Fabrizio Margheritini; Paolo Cabitza; Giada Dogliotti; Massimiliano M Corsi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 4.342

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.