Literature DB >> 21533643

Prospective randomised comparison of arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair of the supraspinatus tendon.

Philip Kasten1, Christoph Keil, Thomas Grieser, Patric Raiss, Nikolaus Streich, Markus Loew.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate whether arthroscopic (ASC) repair of rotator cuff ruptures causes less postoperative pain and better range of motion (ROM) in the early postoperative period than a mini-open (MO) technique.
METHODS: Inclusion criteria were a rupture of the supraspinatus tendon with retraction with a maximum to the apex of the humeral head and minor fatty degeneration and atrophy of the muscle. Each group (n = 17) had similar demographics and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings (mean age 60.1 years, SD 8.8, range 43-71). The ASC group underwent double-row repair with resorbable anchors; the MO group received a transosseous repair. The postoperative rehabilitation was standardised and equivalent in both groups.
RESULTS: In the first week fewer nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) tablets were needed in the ASC group. Pain scores on the visual analogue scale were similar in the first three weeks; however, from week four to eight the MO group had less pain (p < 0.05). After six months, the Constant-Murley score and the ROM improved significantly (p < 0.05) in both groups without differences between the groups. Postoperative MRI revealed in three of 16 patients a discontinuity of the tendon in both groups; in the ASC group there were more patients (n = 9) with a thinning of the tendon compared to the MO group (n = 6).
CONCLUSIONS: There was less use of NSAIDs in the first postoperative week in the ASC group, indirectly indicating less pain, but higher pain scores in the later course (weeks four to eight) compared to the MO group. ROM, MRI findings and the scores were similar after six months, demonstrating that both techniques are equivalent regarding the outcome in this period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21533643      PMCID: PMC3193969          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-011-1262-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  40 in total

Review 1.  Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: transition from mini-open to all-arthroscopic.

Authors:  K Yamaguchi; C M Ball; L M Galatz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Arthroscopic vs mini-open rotator cuff repair. A quality of life impairment study.

Authors:  Leonardo Osti; Rocco Papalia; Massimo Paganelli; Enzo Denaro; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  An analysis of outcome of arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair using subjective and objective scoring tools.

Authors:  T Colegate-Stone; R Allom; A Tavakkolizadeh; J Sinha
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  Arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kenneth Morse; A David Davis; Robert Afra; Elizabeth Krall Kaye; Anthony Schepsis; Ilya Voloshin
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Mini-open versus all-arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: comparison of the operative costs and the clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Kamil Cağri Köse; Engin Tezen; Oğuz Cebesoy; Engin Karadeniz; Dervis Guner; Sinan Adiyaman; Mehmet Demirtas
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.845

6.  Surgical repair of chronic rotator cuff tears. A prospective long-term study.

Authors:  R H Cofield; J Parvizi; P J Hoffmeyer; W L Lanzer; D M Ilstrup; C M Rowland
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression in the subacromial bursa is increased in patients with impingement syndrome.

Authors:  K Yanagisawa; K Hamada; M Gotoh; Y Oshika; M Tomisawa; Y H Lee; A Handa; H Kijima; H Yamazaki; M Nakamura; Y Ueyama; N Tamaoki; H Fukuda
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Results of open repair of the rotator cuff--a long-term review of 79 shoulders.

Authors:  T Motycka; B Kriegleder; F Landsiedl
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  Interleukin-1-induced subacromial synovitis and shoulder pain in rotator cuff diseases.

Authors:  M Gotoh; K Hamada; H Yamakawa; K Yanagisawa; M Nakamura; H Yamazaki; Y Ueyama; N Tamaoki; A Inoue; H Fukuda
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 7.580

10.  Total cost and operating room time comparison of rotator cuff repair techniques at low, intermediate, and high volume centers: mini-open versus all-arthroscopic.

Authors:  R Sean Churchill; Jugal K Ghorai
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 3.019

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  [Controversies in the therapy of rotator cuff tears. Operative or nonoperative treatment, open or arthroscopic repair?].

Authors:  O Lorbach
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: a prospective, randomized study with 24-month follow-up.

Authors:  Zhenxiang Zhang; Beibei Gu; Wei Zhu; Lixian Zhu; Qingsong Li
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-06-28

Review 3.  Magnetic resonance imaging criteria for the assessment of the rotator cuff after repair: a systematic review.

Authors:  Maristella F Saccomanno; Gianpiero Cazzato; Mario Fodale; Giuseppe Sircana; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-01-04       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  Immunobiological factors aggravating the fatty infiltration on tendons and muscles in rotator cuff lesions.

Authors:  Finosh G Thankam; Matthew F Dilisio; Devendra K Agrawal
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 3.396

5.  I.S.Mu.L.T - Rotator Cuff Tears Guidelines.

Authors:  Francesco Oliva; Eleonora Piccirilli; Michela Bossa; Alessio Giai Via; Alessandra Colombo; Claudio Chillemi; Giuseppe Gasparre; Leonardo Pellicciari; Edoardo Franceschetti; Clelia Rugiero; Alessandro Scialdoni; Filippo Vittadini; Paola Brancaccio; Domenico Creta; Angelo Del Buono; Raffaele Garofalo; Francesco Franceschi; Antonio Frizziero; Asmaa Mahmoud; Giovanni Merolla; Simone Nicoletti; Marco Spoliti; Leonardo Osti; Johnny Padulo; Nicola Portinaro; Gianfranco Tajana; Alex Castagna; Calogero Foti; Stefano Masiero; Giuseppe Porcellini; Umberto Tarantino; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2016-02-13

6.  [Open transosseous reconstruction of the rotator cuff: clinical outcome, influencing factors and complications].

Authors:  D Maier; M Jaeger; K Izadpanah; D Herschel; P Ogon; P C Strohm; N P Südkamp
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  No difference in postoperative pain after arthroscopic versus open rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Gerald Williams; Matthew J Kraeutler; Benjamin Zmistowski; John M Fenlin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Evaluation of long-term postoperative outcomes between mini-open and arthroscopic repair for isolated supraspinatus tears: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  G Vicenti; L Moretti; M Carrozzo; V Pesce; G Solarino; B Moretti
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2018-10-20

Review 9.  Update on all-arthroscopic vs. mini-open rotator cuff repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Seaher Sakha; Safiya Erdogan; Ajaykumar Shanmugaraj; Marcel Betsch; Timothy Leroux; Moin Khan
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-03-27

10.  The Relevance of Open Rotator Cuff Repair in 2021.

Authors:  Khalid D Mohammed; Richard F W Lloyd; Chethan Nagaraj; Jegan Krishnan
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.