Literature DB >> 17509287

Decreased complications of contemporary laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: use of a standardized reporting system.

Matthew N Simmons1, Inderbir S Gill.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We report complications of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in a contemporary cohort of 200 patients using a standardized complication reporting system.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of 200 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy between September 2003 and November 2005 were reviewed. Mean tumor size was 3 cm and mean parenchymal invasion depth was 1.8 cm. There were 97 central tumors (48.5%) and 9 tumors (4.5%) in a solitary kidney. Complication severity for each patient was graded using a 5-tiered scale based on National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria. Statistical analysis was done to assess risk factors associated with complication events.
RESULTS: A total of 35 patients (17.5%) had complications. The overall complication rate was 19%. Of the complications 29%, 42%, 26% and 2.6% were grades I to IV, respectively. There were no grade V complications. Median blood loss was 150 ml. Hemorrhagic and urine leak complications occurred in 9 (4.5%) and 4 patients (2%), respectively. Conversion to open partial and laparoscopic radical nephrectomy was done electively in 2 (1%) and 1 patients (0.5%), respectively. Compared to previously reported data on the initial 200 patients in our laparoscopic partial nephrectomy cohort this contemporary group of 200 had statistically significant decreases in overall, urological and hemorrhagic complication rates despite an increase in tumor complexity (p = 0.02, 0.04 and 0.04, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Increased experience with advanced laparoscopic techniques has allowed a significantly decreased complication rate following contemporary laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, which now appears comparable to that of open partial nephrectomy. A standardized complication reporting system is advocated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17509287     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.01.129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  29 in total

1.  Prediction of perioperative outcomes following minimally invasive partial nephrectomy: role of the R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score.

Authors:  Zhuo-Wei Liu; Ephrem O Olweny; Gang Yin; Stephen Faddegon; Yung K Tan; Woong Kyu Han; Jeffrey A Cadeddu
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-04-28       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: risk stratification according to patient and tumor characteristics.

Authors:  Stephan Kruck; Aristoteles G Anastasiadis; Ute Walcher; Arnulf Stenzl; Thomas R W Herrmann; Udo Nagele
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  The role of minimally invasive surgery in multifocal renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Serge Ginzburg; Robert G Uzzo; Alexander Kutikov
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Partial nephrectomy: is there still a need for open surgery?

Authors:  Varun Sharma; Markus Margreiter
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Complications of Minimally Invasive Surgery and Their Management.

Authors:  Joshua R Kaplan; Ziho Lee; Daniel D Eun; Adam C Reese
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  American Confederation of Urology (CAU) experience in minimally invasive partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Fernando P Secin; Octavio A Castillo; José J Rozanec; Marcelo Featherston; Pablo Holst; José Cocisfran Alves Milfont; Patricio García Marchiñena; Alberto Jurado Navarro; Anamaría Autrán; Agustín R Rovegno; Oscar Rodríguez Faba; Joan Palou; Victor Teixeira Dubeux; Luciano Nuñez Bragayrac; Rene Sotelo; Stenio Zequi; Gustavo Cardoso Guimarães; Mario Álvarez-Maestro; Luis Martínez-Piñeiro; Gustavo Villoldo; Alberto Villaronga; Diego Abreu Clavijo; Ricardo Decia; Rodrigo Frota; Ivar Vidal-Mora; Diana Finkelstein; Juan I Monzó Gardiner; Oscar Schatloff; Andres Hernández-Porrás; Félix Santaella-Torres; Emilio T Quesada; Rodolfo Sánchez-Salas; Hugo Dávila; Humberto Villavicencio Mavric
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  [Open and minimally invasive partial nephrectomy. Management of complications].

Authors:  C Wülfing; U Humke
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 8.  Partial nephrectomy--contemporary indications, techniques and outcomes.

Authors:  Scott Leslie; Alvin C Goh; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 9.  Complications of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Reinhold Zimmermann; Günter Janetschek
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for >4 cm renal masses.

Authors:  Fahad A Alyami; Ricardo A Rendon
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.