Literature DB >> 17508335

Experimental evolution of olfactory memory in Drosophila melanogaster.

Frederic Mery1, Juliette Pont, Thomas Preat, Tadeusz J Kawecki.   

Abstract

In order to address the nature of genetic variation in learning performance, we investigated the response to classical olfactory conditioning in "high-learning" Drosophila melanogaster lines previously subject to selection for the ability to learn an association between the flavor of an oviposition medium and bitter taste. In a T-maze choice test, the seven high-learning lines were better at avoiding an odor previously associated with aversive mechanical shock than were five unselected "low-learning" lines originating from the same natural population. Thus, the evolved improvement in learning ability of high-learning lines generalized to another aversion learning task involving a different aversive stimulus (shock instead of bitter taste) and a different behavioral context than that used to impose selection. In this olfactory shock task, the high-learning lines showed improvements in the learning rate as well as in two forms of consolidated memory: anesthesia-resistant memory and long-term memory. Thus, genetic variation underlying the experimental evolution of learning performance in the high-learning lines affected several phases of memory formation in the course of olfactory aversive learning. However, the two forms of consolidated memory were negatively correlated among replicate high-learning lines, which is consistent with a recent hypothesis that these two forms of consolidated memory are antagonistic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17508335     DOI: 10.1086/518014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Biochem Zool        ISSN: 1522-2152            Impact factor:   2.247


  9 in total

1.  Male cognitive performance declines in the absence of sexual selection.

Authors:  Brian Hollis; Tadeusz J Kawecki
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Multiple genetic loci affect place learning and memory performance in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Patricka A Williams-Simon; Christopher Posey; Samuel Mitchell; Enoch Ng'oma; James A Mrkvicka; Troy Zars; Elizabeth G King
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 3.449

3.  A natural genetic polymorphism affects retroactive interference in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Christopher J Reaume; Marla B Sokolowski; Frederic Mery
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Protein kinase A inhibits a consolidated form of memory in Drosophila.

Authors:  Junjiro Horiuchi; Daisuke Yamazaki; Shintaro Naganos; Toshiro Aigaki; Minoru Saitoe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Natural polymorphism affecting learning and memory in Drosophila.

Authors:  Frederic Mery; Amsale T Belay; Anthony K-C So; Marla B Sokolowski; Tadeusz J Kawecki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Functional and evolutionary trade-offs co-occur between two consolidated memory phases in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Fabrice Lagasse; Celine Moreno; Thomas Preat; Frederic Mery
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Quantitative genetics of learning ability and resistance to stress in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Virginie Nepoux; Aurélie Babin; Christoph Haag; Tadeusz J Kawecki; Arnaud Le Rouzic
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Drosophila rely on learning while foraging under semi-natural conditions.

Authors:  Vukašin Zrelec; Marco Zini; Sandra Guarino; Julien Mermoud; Joël Oppliger; Annabelle Valtat; Valérian Zeender; Tadeusz J Kawecki
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Selection for associative learning of color stimuli reveals correlated evolution of this learning ability across multiple stimuli and rewards.

Authors:  Maartje Liefting; Katja M Hoedjes; Cécile Le Lann; Hans M Smid; Jacintha Ellers
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.694

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.