Literature DB >> 17507811

Magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiography: quantitative and qualitative comparison of 3.0 Tesla with 1.5 Tesla.

Sebastian T Schindera1, Chad M Miller, Lisa M Ho, David M DeLong, Elmar M Merkle.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine quantitative and qualitative image quality in patients undergoing magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiography at 3.0 Tesla (T) compared with 1.5 T.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients (30 women; mean age, 51 years) underwent MR cholangiography at 1.5 T; another 50 patients (25 women; mean age 51 years) were scanned at 3.0 T. MR sequence protocol consisted of breath-hold single-slice rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement (RARE) and a respiratory-triggered 3D turbo spin echo (3D TSE) sequence. Maximum intensity projections were generated from the 3D TSE datasets. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) measurements between the common bile duct (CBD), left and right intrahepatic duct (LHD, RHD), and periductal tissue were performed. Three radiologists assessed qualitatively the visibility of the CBD, LHD, and RHD and the overall diagnostic quality.
RESULTS: Mean gain in CNR at 3.0 T versus 1.5 T in all 3 locations ranged for the RARE sequence from 7.7% to 38.1% and for the 3D TSE from 0.5% to 26.1% (P > 0.05 for all differences). Qualitative analysis did not reveal any significant difference between the 2 field strengths (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: MR cholangiography at 3.0 T shows a trend toward higher CNR without improving image quality significantly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17507811     DOI: 10.1097/01.rli.0000261940.98762.20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  3 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with GRASE sequence at 3.0T: does it improve image quality and acquisition time as compared with 3D TSE?

Authors:  Morikatsu Yoshida; Takeshi Nakaura; Taihei Inoue; Shota Tanoue; Sentaro Takada; Daisuke Utsunomiya; Shota Tsumagari; Kazunori Harada; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the evaluation of biliary disease.

Authors:  Humoud Al-Dhuhli
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2009-12-19

3.  A Nondestructive Method to Distinguish the Internal Constituent Architecture of the Intervertebral Discs Using 9.4 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Vithanage N Wijayathunga; John P Ridgway; Eileen Ingham; Darren Treanor; Duane Carey; Andy Bulpitt; Derek Magee; Robin Damion; Ruth K Wilcox
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.468

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.