Literature DB >> 17506731

Cost effectiveness of adult intensive care in the UK.

S Ridley1, S Morris.   

Abstract

We wished to investigate whether intensive care represents good value for money to the National Health Service in the UK using cost-effectiveness analysis. We developed a cost-effectiveness model using secondary data sources to estimate the incremental cost per quality adjusted life year gained of treatment in intensive care vs non-intensive care treatment in adults. Estimates of hospital mortality with and without intensive care were obtained from seven published studies and from data published by the Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre. Quality of life estimates were obtained from a literature review and NHS reference costs were used. Relative to non-intensive care treatment, the incremental cost per quality adjusted life year gained of treatment in intensive care is 7010 pounds. This figure is sensitive to the mortality risk reduction associated with intensive care. Despite the high daily cost of intensive care, its cost-effectiveness is excellent and compares favourably with other commonly used health interventions. Our findings suggest that adult intensive care represents good value for money.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17506731     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.04997.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  17 in total

1.  Intensive care in 2050: healthcare expenditure.

Authors:  B Guidet; P H J van der Voort; A Csomos
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Cost effectiveness of intensive care in a low resource setting: A prospective cohort of medical critically ill patients.

Authors:  Hajrunisa Cubro; Rabija Somun-Kapetanovic; Guillaume Thiery; Daniel Talmor; Ognjen Gajic
Journal:  World J Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-05-04

3.  Returns to Local-Area Healthcare Spending: Evidence from Health Shocks to Patients Far From Home.

Authors:  Joseph J Doyle
Journal:  Am Econ J Appl Econ       Date:  2011-07

4.  A costly separation between withdrawing and withholding treatment in intensive care.

Authors:  Dominic Wilkinson; Julian Savulescu
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 1.898

5.  Mortality prediction in intensive care units with the Super ICU Learner Algorithm (SICULA): a population-based study.

Authors:  Romain Pirracchio; Maya L Petersen; Marco Carone; Matthieu Resche Rigon; Sylvie Chevret; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 30.700

Review 6.  Acute kidney injury in elderly intensive care patients: a review.

Authors:  Alexandra Chronopoulos; Mitchell H Rosner; Dinna N Cruz; Claudio Ronco
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  One-year mortality, quality of life and predicted life-time cost-utility in critically ill patients with acute respiratory failure.

Authors:  Rita Linko; Raili Suojaranta-Ylinen; Sari Karlsson; Esko Ruokonen; Tero Varpula; Ville Pettilä
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Hospital-level variation in ICU admission and critical care procedures for patients hospitalized for pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Andrew J Admon; Christopher W Seymour; Hayley B Gershengorn; Hannah Wunsch; Colin R Cooke
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Potential clinical and economic outcomes of active beta-D-glucan surveillance with preemptive therapy for invasive candidiasis at intensive care units: a decision model analysis.

Authors:  Y-K Pang; M Ip; J H S You
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Quality of life in the five years after intensive care: a cohort study.

Authors:  Brian H Cuthbertson; Siân Roughton; David Jenkinson; Graeme Maclennan; Luke Vale
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.