Literature DB >> 17506111

Disruption of URA7 and GAL6 improves the ethanol tolerance and fermentation capacity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Hisashi Yazawa1, Hitoshi Iwahashi, Hiroshi Uemura.   

Abstract

Screening of the homozygous diploid yeast deletion pool of 4741 non-essential genes identified two null mutants (Deltaura7 and Deltagal6) that grew faster than the wild-type strain in medium containing 8% v/v ethanol. The survival rate of the gal6 disruptant in 10% ethanol was higher than that of the wild-type strain. On the other hand, the glucose consumption rate of the ura7 disruptant was better than that of the wild-type strain in buffer containing ethanol. Both disruptants were more resistant to zymolyase, a yeast lytic enzyme containing mainly beta-1,3-glucanase, indicating that the integrity of the cell wall became more resistance to ethanol stress. The gal6 disruptant was also more resistant to Calcofluor white, but the ura7 disruptant was more sensitive to Calcofluor white than the wild-type strain. Furthermore, the mutant strains had a higher content of oleic acid (C18 : 1) in the presence of ethanol compared to the wild-type strain, suggesting that the disruptants cope with ethanol stress not only by modifying the cell wall integrity but also the membrane fluidity. When the cells were grown in medium containing 5% ethanol at 15 degrees C, the gal6 and ura7 disruptants showed 40% and 14% increases in the glucose consumption rate, respectively. Copyright (c) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17506111     DOI: 10.1002/yea.1492

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Yeast        ISSN: 0749-503X            Impact factor:   3.239


  13 in total

1.  Turbidostat culture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae W303-1A under selective pressure elicited by ethanol selects for mutations in SSD1 and UTH1.

Authors:  Liat Avrahami-Moyal; David Engelberg; Jared W Wenger; Gavin Sherlock; Sergei Braun
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 2.796

2.  Identification of novel genes responsible for salt tolerance by transposon mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Won-Kun Park; Ji-Won Yang; Hyun-Soo Kim
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 3.346

3.  Generation and characterisation of stable ethanol-tolerant mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Dragana Stanley; Sarah Fraser; Paul J Chambers; Peter Rogers; Grant A Stanley
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 3.346

4.  Improve carbon metabolic flux in Saccharomyces cerevisiae at high temperature by overexpressed TSL1 gene.

Authors:  Xiang-Yang Ge; Yan Xu; Xiang Chen
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2013-02-02       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 5.  Progress in metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Elke Nevoigt
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 11.056

6.  Genome-wide Fitness Profiles Reveal a Requirement for Autophagy During Yeast Fermentation.

Authors:  Nina Piggott; Michael A Cook; Mike Tyers; Vivien Measday
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.154

7.  Different selective pressures lead to different genomic outcomes as newly-formed hybrid yeasts evolve.

Authors:  Jeff S Piotrowski; Saisubramanian Nagarajan; Evgueny Kroll; Alison Stanbery; Kami E Chiotti; Arthur L Kruckeberg; Barbara Dunn; Gavin Sherlock; Frank Rosenzweig
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  Cellulosic Ethanol Production by Recombinant Cellulolytic Bacteria Harbouring pdc and adh II Genes of Zymomonas mobilis.

Authors:  P Sobana Piriya; P Thirumalai Vasan; V S Padma; U Vidhyadevi; K Archana; S John Vennison
Journal:  Biotechnol Res Int       Date:  2012-07-20

9.  Genome-wide study of the adaptation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to the early stages of wine fermentation.

Authors:  Maite Novo; Ana Mangado; Manuel Quirós; Pilar Morales; Zoel Salvadó; Ramon Gonzalez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Solving ethanol production problems with genetically modified yeast strains.

Authors:  A Abreu-Cavalheiro; G Monteiro
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 2.476

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.