Literature DB >> 17505900

Measurement of particle concentrations in a dental office.

Maria Sotiriou1, Stephen F Ferguson, Mark Davey, Jack M Wolfson, Philip Demokritou, Joy Lawrence, Sonja N Sax, Petros Koutrakis.   

Abstract

Particles in a dental office can be generated by a number of instruments, such as air-turbine handpieces, low-speed handpieces, ultrasonic scalers, bicarbonate polishers, polishing cups, as well as drilling and air sprays inside the oral cavity. This study examined the generation of particles during dental drilling and measured particle size, mass, and trace elements. The air sampling techniques included both continuous and integrated methods. The following particle continuous measurements were taken every minute: (1) size-selective particle number concentration (Climet); (2) total particle number concentration (PTRAK), and; (3) particle mass concentration (DustTrak). Integrated particle samples were collected for about 5 h on each of five sampling days, using a PM(2.5) sampler (ChemComb) for elemental/organic carbon analysis, and a PM(10) sampler (Harvard Impactor) for mass and elemental analyses. There was strong evidence that these procedures result in particle concentrations above background. The dental procedures produced number concentrations of relatively small particles (<0.5 microm) that were much higher than concentrations produced for the relatively larger particles (>0.5 microm). Also, these dental procedures caused significant elevation above background of certain trace elements (measured by X-ray fluorescence) but did not cause any elevation of elemental carbon (measured by thermal optical reflectance). Dental drilling procedures aerosolize saliva and products of drilling, producing particles small enough to penetrate deep into the lungs. The potential health impacts of the exposure of dental personnel to such particles need to be evaluated. Increased ventilation and personal breathing protection could be used to minimize harmful effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17505900     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-007-9770-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   3.307


  22 in total

1.  Microbial aerosols in general dental practice.

Authors:  A M Bennett; M R Fulford; J T Walker; D J Bradshaw; M V Martin; P D Marsh
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2000-12-23       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  The effect of two polishing pastes on the surface roughness of bis-acryl composite and methacrylate-based resins.

Authors:  Deniz Sen; Gültekin Göller; Halim Işsever
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  Method comparisons for particulate nitrate, elemental carbon, and PM2.5 mass in seven U.S. cities.

Authors:  P Babich; M Davey; G Allen; P Koutrakis
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.235

4.  Aerosol and splatter contamination from the operative site during ultrasonic scaling.

Authors:  S K Harrel; J B Barnes; F Rivera-Hidalgo
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.634

5.  Trace element concentrations in human enamel.

Authors:  F L Losee; M E Curzon; M F Little
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 2.633

6.  A pumice-zirconium silicate prophylaxis paste containing 2 per cent stannous fluoride in water-free solution.

Authors:  I L Shannon
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther Dent       Date:  1970-10

7.  Evaluating spatter and aerosol contamination during dental procedures.

Authors:  C D Bentley; N W Burkhart; J J Crawford
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.634

8.  Barium and strontium leaching from aged glass particle/resin matrix dental composites.

Authors:  Manshui Zhou; James L Drummond; Luke Hanley
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.304

9.  A pilot investigation of the relative toxicity of indoor and outdoor fine particles: in vitro effects of endotoxin and other particulate properties.

Authors:  C M Long; H H Suh; L Kobzik; P J Catalano; Y Y Ning; P Koutrakis
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Aerosols and splatter in dentistry: a brief review of the literature and infection control implications.

Authors:  Stephen K Harrel; John Molinari
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.634

View more
  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of a low-cost electrostatic dust fall collector for indoor air endotoxin exposure assessment.

Authors:  Ilka Noss; Inge M Wouters; Maaike Visser; Dick J J Heederik; Peter S Thorne; Bert Brunekreef; Gert Doekes
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Efficacy of dental evacuation systems for aerosol exposure mitigation in dental clinic settings.

Authors:  Brie Hawley Blackley; Kimberly R Anderson; Fotinos Panagakos; Tammy Chipps; M Abbas Virji
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.359

3.  Exposure of patient and dental staff to fine and ultrafine particles from scanning spray.

Authors:  Stefan Rupf; Hendrik Berger; Axel Buchter; Volker Harth; Mei Fang Ong; Matthias Hannig
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Interventions to reduce contaminated aerosols produced during dental procedures for preventing infectious diseases.

Authors:  Sumanth Kumbargere Nagraj; Prashanti Eachempati; Martha Paisi; Mona Nasser; Gowri Sivaramakrishnan; Jos H Verbeek
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-10-12

5.  Removal efficiency of central vacuum system and protective masks to suspended particles from dental treatment.

Authors:  Ming-Hui Liu; Chi-Tsung Chen; Li-Chuan Chuang; Wen-Ming Lin; Gwo-Hwa Wan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Can aerosols-generating dental, oral and maxillofacial, and orthopedic surgical procedures lead to disease transmission? An implication on the current COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Essam Ahmed Al-Moraissi; Amanjot Kaur; Frank Günther; Andreas Neff; Nikolaos Christidis
Journal:  Front Oral Health       Date:  2022-08-01

7.  Bioaerosol distribution characteristics and potential SARS-CoV-2 infection risk in a multi-compartment dental clinic.

Authors:  Zhijian Liu; Guangpeng Yao; Yabin Li; Zhenzhe Huang; Chuan Jiang; Junzhou He; Minnan Wu; Jia Liu; Haiyang Liu
Journal:  Build Environ       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 7.093

8.  The Effect of Er:YAG Lasers on the Reduction of Aerosol Formation for Dental Workers.

Authors:  Kinga Grzech-Leśniak; Jacek Matys
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 3.623

9.  Risk of Contamination of Different Areas of Dentist's Face During Dental Practices.

Authors:  Farahnaz Nejatidanesh; Zeynab Khosravi; Hossein Goroohi; Hamid Badrian; Omid Savabi
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2013-05

10.  The Protective Role of Front-Closed and Front-Open Gowns Against Staphylococcus Aureus Contamination of Dental Students before and after Restorative Treatments.

Authors:  Bahar Afroozi; Maryam Mardani; Ahmad Motaghi; Arezoo Tahmorespour
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2018-12
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.