PURPOSE: A retrospective analysis of the toxicity and efficacy of temozolomide in advanced neuroendocrine tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Thirty-six patients with advanced stages of neuroendocrine tumor (1 gastric, 7 thymic and 13 bronchial carcinoids, 12 pancreatic endocrine tumors, 1 paraganglioma, 1 neuroendocrine foregut, and 1 neuroendocrine cecal cancer) were treated with temozolomide (200 mg/m(2)) for 5 days every 4 weeks. Patients had previously received a mean of 2.4 antitumoral medical regimens. Tumor response was evaluated radiologically according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors every 3 months on an intent-to-treat basis. The circulating tumor marker plasma chromogranin A was also assessed. The expression of O(6)-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase, an enzyme implicated in chemotherapy resistance, was studied by immunohistochemistry (n=23) and compared with response to temozolomide. RESULTS: Median overall time to progression was 7 months (95% confidence interval, 3-10). Radiologic response was seen in 14% of patients and stable disease in 53%. Side effects were mainly hematologic; 14% experienced grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia (National Cancer Institute toxicity criteria). Ten patients had tumors with O(6)-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase immunoreactivity in <10% of nuclei, whereas four patients showed radiologic responses. CONCLUSIONS: Temozolomide as monotherapy had acceptable toxicity and antitumoral effects in a small series of patients with advanced malignant neuroendocrine tumors and four of these showed radiologic responses.
PURPOSE: A retrospective analysis of the toxicity and efficacy of temozolomide in advanced neuroendocrine tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Thirty-six patients with advanced stages of neuroendocrine tumor (1 gastric, 7 thymic and 13 bronchial carcinoids, 12 pancreatic endocrine tumors, 1 paraganglioma, 1 neuroendocrine foregut, and 1 neuroendocrine cecal cancer) were treated with temozolomide (200 mg/m(2)) for 5 days every 4 weeks. Patients had previously received a mean of 2.4 antitumoral medical regimens. Tumor response was evaluated radiologically according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors every 3 months on an intent-to-treat basis. The circulating tumor marker plasma chromogranin A was also assessed. The expression of O(6)-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase, an enzyme implicated in chemotherapy resistance, was studied by immunohistochemistry (n=23) and compared with response to temozolomide. RESULTS: Median overall time to progression was 7 months (95% confidence interval, 3-10). Radiologic response was seen in 14% of patients and stable disease in 53%. Side effects were mainly hematologic; 14% experienced grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia (National Cancer Institute toxicity criteria). Ten patients had tumors with O(6)-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase immunoreactivity in <10% of nuclei, whereas four patients showed radiologic responses. CONCLUSIONS:Temozolomide as monotherapy had acceptable toxicity and antitumoral effects in a small series of patients with advanced malignant neuroendocrine tumors and four of these showed radiologic responses.
Authors: Roeland F de Wilde; Barish H Edil; Ralph H Hruban; Anirban Maitra Journal: Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2012-02-07 Impact factor: 46.802
Authors: Satsuki Komoda; Takeshi Komoda; Christoph Knosalla; Marianne E Pavel; Lars Morawietz; Ludwig Fischer von Weikersthal; Hans B Lehmkuhl; Roland Hetzer Journal: Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2012-05-30
Authors: Jennifer A Chan; Keith Stuart; Craig C Earle; Jeffrey W Clark; Pankaj Bhargava; Rebecca Miksad; Lawrence Blaszkowsky; Peter C Enzinger; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Hui Zheng; Charles S Fuchs; Matthew H Kulke Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-07-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Skye C Mayo; Joseph M Herman; David Cosgrove; Nik Bhagat; Ihab Kamel; Jean-Francois H Geschwind; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2012-10-11 Impact factor: 6.113