Andrew Lotery1, Xiao Xu, Gergana Zlatava, Jane Loftus. 1. University of Southampton, Southampton Eye Unit, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK. a.j.lotery@soton.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Quantitative data regarding the impact of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NV-AMD) on individuals and society is a prerequisite for rational decision-making processes when evaluating alternative treatments for the disease. METHODS: 75 bilateral NV-AMD (patients) and 91 elderly non-AMD (controls) subjects forming the UK cohort of an international cross-sectional, observational study were independently analysed. Subjects completed a telephone survey including the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ-25), the EuroQol (EQ-5D), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), history of falls and health resource utilisation. RESULTS: Patients with NV-AMD reported substantially worse vision-related functioning and overall well-being, including higher depression scores, than controls after adjusting for age, gender and co-morbidities (adjusted mean scores: NEI-VFQ-25 overall 52.7 vs 90.7, p<0.0001; EQ-5D 0.67 vs 0.77, p = 0.0273; HADS depression 6.8 vs 4.0, p = 0.0026). Significantly more patients reported a need for assistance with daily activities compared with controls (25.3% vs 6.6%, p = 0.003). Total annual healthcare utilisation costs were more than sevenfold higher for patients with AMD compared with controls ( pound 3,823.89 vs pound 517.05, respectively; p<0.0001) CONCLUSIONS: Patients with NV-AMD show a significant decline in quality of life and increased need for daily living assistance compared to a control population without AMD. With the availability of effective new therapies there is a need for improved early access to treatment.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Quantitative data regarding the impact of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NV-AMD) on individuals and society is a prerequisite for rational decision-making processes when evaluating alternative treatments for the disease. METHODS: 75 bilateral NV-AMD (patients) and 91 elderly non-AMD (controls) subjects forming the UK cohort of an international cross-sectional, observational study were independently analysed. Subjects completed a telephone survey including the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ-25), the EuroQol (EQ-5D), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), history of falls and health resource utilisation. RESULTS:Patients with NV-AMD reported substantially worse vision-related functioning and overall well-being, including higher depression scores, than controls after adjusting for age, gender and co-morbidities (adjusted mean scores: NEI-VFQ-25 overall 52.7 vs 90.7, p<0.0001; EQ-5D 0.67 vs 0.77, p = 0.0273; HADS depression 6.8 vs 4.0, p = 0.0026). Significantly more patients reported a need for assistance with daily activities compared with controls (25.3% vs 6.6%, p = 0.003). Total annual healthcare utilisation costs were more than sevenfold higher for patients with AMD compared with controls ( pound 3,823.89 vs pound 517.05, respectively; p<0.0001) CONCLUSIONS:Patients with NV-AMD show a significant decline in quality of life and increased need for daily living assistance compared to a control population without AMD. With the availability of effective new therapies there is a need for improved early access to treatment.
Authors: Jayakrishna Ambati; Balamurali K Ambati; Sonia H Yoo; Sean Ianchulev; Anthony P Adamis Journal: Surv Ophthalmol Date: 2003 May-Jun Impact factor: 6.048
Authors: Melissa M Brown; Gary C Brown; Sanjay Sharma; Joshua D Stein; Zachary Roth; Joseph Campanella; George R Beauchamp Journal: Curr Opin Ophthalmol Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 3.761
Authors: Gary C Brown; Melissa M Brown; Sanjay Sharma; Joshua D Stein; Zachary Roth; Joseph Campanella; George R Beauchamp Journal: Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc Date: 2005
Authors: Mireia Espallargues; Carolyn J Czoski-Murray; Nicholas J Bansback; Jill Carlton; Grace M Lewis; Lindsey A Hughes; Christopher S Brand; John E Brazier Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Li Ming Dong; Ashley L Childs; Carol M Mangione; Eric B Bass; Neil M Bressler; Barbara S Hawkins; Marta J Marsh; Päivi Miskala; Harrris A Jaffee; Lee A McCaffrey Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: L-Y Ngai; N Stocks; J M Sparrow; R Patel; A Rumley; G Lowe; G Davey Smith; Y Ben-Shlomo Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2011-03-25 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: Xinzhi Zhang; Kai McKeever Bullard; Mary Frances Cotch; M Roy Wilson; Barry W Rovner; Gerald McGwin; Cynthia Owsley; Lawrence Barker; John E Crews; Jinan B Saaddine Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 7.389