Literature DB >> 17503889

Risperidone versus Conventional Antipsychotics for Schizophrenia and Schizoaffective Disorder : Symptoms, Quality of Life and Resource Use under Customary Clinical Care.

Ramy A Mahmoud1, Luella M Engelhart, Carmela C Janagap, Gerry Oster, Dan Ollendorf.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively compare risperidone with conventional antipsychotic agents among schizophrenia patients treated under usual practice conditions.
DESIGN: One-year, multicentre, open-label, randomised trial carried out in 21 centres in 17 states of the US. PATIENTS: 684 patients were followed from 1995 to 1997, and must have experienced a symptom relapse at study start.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to risperidone therapy or their physician's 'best choice' of any one of the 13 conventional antipsychotic medications approved in the US. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND
RESULTS: Outcomes measured were changes in psychiatric symptoms, side effects, satisfaction with drug therapy, quality of life (including health-related quality of life [HRQOL]) and resource utilisation. A subgroup analysis of the non-switchers was also conducted. Irrespective of treatment group, treatment switching and days with no drug therapy were observed. Compared with patients on conventional antipsychotics, those in the risperidone group achieved statistically superior scores on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) [PANSS total score improved from 83.32 to 61.80 vs 81.42 to 66.99 in the risperidone and conventional groups, respectively), Barnes Akathisia Scale (scores improved from 0.89 to 0.55 vs 0.87 to 0.81 in the risperidone and conventional groups, respectively), and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) scale (scores improved from 32.83 to 39.92 vs 32.55 to 37.22 in the risperidone and conventional groups, respectively) during the 1-year treatment period. A significantly higher percentage of risperidone- treated patients had a 60% improvement in PANSS scores at 12 months (20.9% of patients compared with 10.7% in the risperidone and conventional groups, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in resource utilisation between the two groups. Among non-switchers, patients in the risperidone group had lower total costs and more clinical benefits.
CONCLUSIONS: Conditions of usual practice resulted in a high degree of non-treatment, treatment changing and multi-antipsychotic drug therapy. Patients in the risperidone group had better clinical outcomes (e.g. reduced psychiatric symptoms and side effects) and improved HRQOL. There were no significant differences in healthcare utilisation between the two study groups.

Entities:  

Year:  2004        PMID: 17503889     DOI: 10.2165/00044011-200424050-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Drug Investig        ISSN: 1173-2563            Impact factor:   2.859


  26 in total

1.  Time to study discontinuation, relapse, and compliance with atypical or conventional antipsychotics in schizophrenia and related disorders.

Authors:  I D Glick; P H Berg
Journal:  Int Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.659

2.  A meta-analysis of the efficacy of second-generation antipsychotics.

Authors:  John M Davis; Nancy Chen; Ira D Glick
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2003-06

3.  PHENOTHIAZINE TREATMENT IN ACUTE SCHIZOPHRENIA; EFFECTIVENESS: THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY SERVICE CENTER COLLABORATIVE STUDY GROUP.

Authors:  M S GUTTMACHER
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1964-03

4.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  A rating scale for drug-induced akathisia.

Authors:  T R Barnes
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 9.319

6.  Unbalanced repeated-measures models with structured covariance matrices.

Authors:  R I Jennrich; M D Schluchter
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Impact of newer antipsychotics on outcomes in schizophrenia.

Authors:  N A Keks
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.393

8.  Translating research into practice: the Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT) treatment recommendations.

Authors:  A F Lehman; D M Steinwachs
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 9.306

9.  Rehospitalization risk with second-generation and depot antipsychotics.

Authors:  Robert R Conley; Deanna L Kelly; Raymond C Love; Robert P McMahon
Journal:  Ann Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.567

Review 10.  Lower risk for tardive dyskinesia associated with second-generation antipsychotics: a systematic review of 1-year studies.

Authors:  Christoph U Correll; Stefan Leucht; John M Kane
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 18.112

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Functional impairment in people with schizophrenia: focus on employability and eligibility for disability compensation.

Authors:  Philip D Harvey; Robert K Heaton; William T Carpenter; Michael F Green; James M Gold; Michael Schoenbaum
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 2.  Withdrawal symptoms and rebound syndromes associated with switching and discontinuing atypical antipsychotics: theoretical background and practical recommendations.

Authors:  Anja Cerovecki; Richard Musil; Ansgar Klimke; Florian Seemüller; Ekkehard Haen; Rebecca Schennach; Kai-Uwe Kühn; Hans-Peter Volz; Michael Riedel
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.749

3.  Modelling the impact of compliance on the costs and effects of long-acting risperidone in Canada.

Authors:  P S Chue; Bart Heeg; Erik Buskens; Ben A van Hout
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Perphenazine for schizophrenia.

Authors:  Benno Hartung; Stephanie Sampson; Stefan Leucht
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-03-06

5.  A review of pharmacologic strategies for switching to atypical antipsychotics.

Authors:  Prakash S Masand
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2005

6.  Modelling approaches: the case of schizophrenia.

Authors:  Bart M S Heeg; Joep Damen; Erik Buskens; Sue Caleo; Frank de Charro; Ben A van Hout
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  Loxapine for schizophrenia.

Authors:  A Chakrabarti; A Bagnall; P Chue; M Fenton; V Palaniswamy; W Wong; J Xia
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-10-17

Review 8.  Thioridazine for schizophrenia.

Authors:  M Fenton; J Rathbone; J Reilly; A Sultana
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-07-18

9.  Cost-effectiveness of early responders versus early nonresponders to atypical antipsychotic therapy.

Authors:  Xiaomei Peng; Haya Ascher-Svanum; Douglas E Faries; Virginia L Stauffer; Sara Kollack-Walker; Bruce J Kinon; John M Kane
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2011-04-20

10.  A pharmaco-economic analysis of patients with schizophrenia switching to generic risperidone involving a possible compliance loss.

Authors:  Maarten Treur; Bart Heeg; Hans-Jürgen Möller; Annette Schmeding; Ben van Hout
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.